首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Social construction of the managerialism of needs assessment by health and social care professionals.
【24h】

Social construction of the managerialism of needs assessment by health and social care professionals.

机译:卫生和社会护理专业人员对需求评估管理主义的社会建设。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Managerialism in community care has not only radically changed organisational structures delivering care, but the assessment of health and social care needs, the justifications for the assessments, and the experience of those who require publicly funded services. The present paper describes the social construction of the managerialism of needs assessment by health and social care professionals, and illustrates this through the identification of older people as a particular kind of client. The argument draws on 'third way', modernity and postmodernity thinking to show needs assessment as a socially constructed area of welfare. The empirical work in this study is based on the views of 38 health and social care professionals obtained by semi-structured in-depth interviews and a postal questionnaire. The views of these professionals show that the social construction of needs assessment takes place in managing the matching of eligibility criteria against types of services. The key to this process is the application of the concept of management that places health and social care professionals in roles where they are acting for state, voluntary or private agencies, and not in all contexts working together with older people. The study shows that professionals identify older people into two groups or 'classes', i.e. those having health needs as distinct from those with social care. The techniques used amount to an exercise of power by professionals over older people. Change is necessary to break down the dominance by professionals in the needs assessment process. A broader concept of the 'third way' vision by Giddens (1998) is also required to achieve greater relevance to how health and social care is organised, and how relations between professionals and older people are integrated into the idea and practice of participatory care. Therefore, the emancipatory side of modernity remains a largely unfinished project.
机译:社区护理中的管理主义不仅从根本上改变了提供护理的组织结构,而且还改变了对健康和社会护理需求的评估,评估的理由以及那些需要公共资助服务的人们的经验。本文描述了由卫生和社会护理专业人员进行的需求评估管理体系的社会建构,并通过将老年人识别为特殊类型的客户来说明这一点。该论点借鉴了“第三条道路”,现代性和后现代性思想,以将需求评估显示为社会建构的福利领域。本研究的实证工作基于通过半结构化深度访谈和邮政问卷获得的38位卫生和社会护理专业人员的观点。这些专业人员的观点表明,需求评估的社会建构是在管理资格标准与服务类型的匹配方面进行的。此过程的关键是应用管理概念,使卫生保健和社会护理专业人员担任负责国家,自愿或私人机构的角色,而不是在所有情况下都与老年人一起工作。研究表明,专业人士将老年人分为两类或``阶层'',即健康需求与社会照料不同。所使用的技术相当于专业人员对老年人行使权力。必须进行更改以打破专业人员在需求评估过程中的主导地位。还需要吉登斯(Giddens,1998)提出的“第三种方式”的更广泛概念,以更好地了解健康和社会护理的组织方式,以及专业人员和老年人之间的关系如何融入参与式护理的理念和实践中。因此,现代性的解放方面仍然是一个未完成的项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号