首页> 外文期刊>Histology and histopathology >Quantification of protein expression in cells and cellular subcompartments on immunohistochemical sections using a computer supported image analysis system
【24h】

Quantification of protein expression in cells and cellular subcompartments on immunohistochemical sections using a computer supported image analysis system

机译:使用计算机支持的图像分析系统对免疫组织化学切片中细胞和细胞亚小室中蛋白质的表达进行定量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Quantification of protein expression based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an important step for translational research and clinical routine. Several manual ('eyeballing') scoring systems are used in order to semi-quantify protein expression based on chromogenic intensities and distribution patterns. However, manual scoring systems are time-consuming and subject to significant intra- and interobserver variability. The aim of our study was to explore, whether new image analysis software proves to be sufficient as an alternative tool to quantify protein expression. For IHC experiments, one nucleus specific marker (i.e., ERG antibody), one cytoplasmic specific marker (i.e., SLC45A3 antibody), and one marker expressed in both compartments (i.e., TMPRSS2 antibody) were chosen. Stainings were applied on TMAs, containing tumor material of 630 prostate cancer patients. A pathologist visually quantified all IHC stainings in a blinded manner, applying a four-step scoring system. For digital quantification, image analysis software (Tissue Studio v.2.1, Definiens AG, Munich, Germany) was applied to obtain a continuous spectrum of average staining intensity. For each of the three antibodies we found a strong correlation of the manual protein expression score and the score of the image analysis software. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.94, 0.92, and 0.90 for ERG, SLC45A3, and TMPRSS2, respectively (p<0.01). Our data suggest that the image analysis software Tissue Studio is a powerful tool for quantification of protein expression in IHC stainings. Further, since the digital analysis is precise and reproducible, computer supported protein quantification might help to overcome intra- and interobserver variability and increase objectivity of IHC based protein assessment.
机译:基于免疫组织化学(IHC)的蛋白质表达定量是转化研究和临床常规的重要步骤。为了根据生色强度和分布模式对蛋白质表达进行半定量,使用了几种手动(“目测”)评分系统。但是,人工评分系统非常耗时,而且观察者之间和观察者之间存在很大差异。我们研究的目的是探讨新的图像分析软件是否被证明足以作为定量蛋白质表达的替代工具。对于IHC实验,选择了一种细胞核特异性标记物(即ERG抗体),一种胞质特异性标记物(即SLC45A3抗体)和在两个区室中表达的一种标记物(即TMPRSS2抗体)。将染色剂应用于TMA,其中包含630名前列腺癌患者的肿瘤材料。病理学家采用四步评分系统以盲法目测量化所有IHC染色。为了进行数字量化,使用了图像分析软件(Tissue Studio v.2.1,Definiens AG,​​慕尼黑,德国)来获得平均染色强度的连续光谱。对于这三种抗体中的每一种,我们发现手动蛋白质表达得分与图像分析软件的得分之间具有很强的相关性。对于ERG,SLC45A3和TMPRSS2,Spearman等级相关系数分别为0.94、0.92和0.90(p <0.01)。我们的数据表明,图像分析软件Tissue Studio是用于量化IHC染色中蛋白质表达的强大工具。此外,由于数字分析是精确且可重复的,因此计算机支持的蛋白质定量分析可能有助于克服观察者之间和观察者之间的变异性,并提高基于IHC的蛋白质评估的客观性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号