...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >How to do (or not to do) . . . translation of national health accounts data to evidence for policy making in a low resourced setting
【24h】

How to do (or not to do) . . . translation of national health accounts data to evidence for policy making in a low resourced setting

机译:如何做(或不做)。 。 。将国家卫生核算数据转化为资源贫乏地区决策的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For more than a decade, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank have promoted the international standardization of National Health Accounts (NHA) for reporting global statistics on public, private and donor health expenditure and improve the quality of evidence-based decision-making at country level. A 2010-2012 World Bank review of NHA activity in 50 countries found structural and technical constraints (rather than cost) were key impediments to institutionalizing NHA in many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Pilot projects focused resources on data production, neglecting longer-term capacity building for analysing the data, developing ownership among local stakeholders and establishing routine production, utilization and dissemination of NHA data. Hence, genuine institutionalization of NHA in most LMICs has been slow to materialize. International manuals focus on the production of NHA data and do not include practical, incremental and low-cost strategies to guide countries in translating the data into evidence for policy-making. The main aim of this article is to recommend strategies for bridging this divide between production and utilization of NHA data in low-resource settings. The article begins by discussing the origins and purpose of NHA, including factors currently undermining their uptake. The focus then turns to the development and application of strategies to assist LMICs in 'unlocking' the hidden value of their NHA. The article draws on the example of Fiji, a country currently attempting to integrate their NHA data into policy formulation, despiteminimal resources, training and familiarity with economic analysis of health systems. Simple, low cost recommendations such as embedding health finance indicators in planning documents, a user-friendly NHA guide for evaluating local health priorities, and sharing NHA data for collaborative research have helped translate NHA from raw data to evidence for policymaking.
机译:十多年来,经济合作与发展组织(OECD),世界卫生组织(WHO)和世界银行促进了国民健康核算(NHA)的国际标准化,以报告公共,私人的全球统计数据捐助者的卫生支出,并改善国家一级循证决策的质量。世界银行在2010年至2012年对50个国家/地区的NHA活动进行的审查发现,结构和技术限制(而非成本)是许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)将NHA制度化的主要障碍。试点项目将资源集中在数据生产上,忽略了对数据进行分析的长期能力建设,在地方利益相关者之间发展所有权,并建立了常规生产,利用和传播NHA数据的能力。因此,在大多数低收入和中等收入国家中真正实现NHA制度化的步伐缓慢。国际手册侧重于NHA数据的生成,但不包括实用,增量和低成本的策略来指导各国将数据转化为决策依据。本文的主要目的是建议在资源贫乏地区弥合NHA数据的生产和利用之间的这种鸿沟的策略。本文首先讨论了NHA的起源和目的,包括目前破坏其吸收的因素。然后,重点将转向策略的开发和应用,以帮助LMIC“释放”其NHA的隐藏价值。本文以斐济为例,尽管该国资源,培训和对卫生系统经济分析的了解很少,但该国目前正试图将其NHA数据整合到政策制定中。简单,低成本的建议,例如在计划文件中嵌入健康财务指标,易于使用的NHA指南,用于评估当地的健康优先事项,以及共享NHA数据进行合作研究,这些都有助于将NHA从原始数据转化为决策依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号