首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Constraints to implementing an equity-promoting staff allocation policy: Understanding mid-level managers' and nurses' perspectives affecting implementation in South Africa
【24h】

Constraints to implementing an equity-promoting staff allocation policy: Understanding mid-level managers' and nurses' perspectives affecting implementation in South Africa

机译:实施公平促进员工分配政策的制约因素:了解影响南非实施的中层管理人员和护士的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much of current research on issues of equity in low- and middle-income countries focuses on uncovering and describing the extent of inequities in health status and health service provision. In terms of policy responses to inequity, there is a growing body of work on resource reallocation strategies. However, little published work exists on the challenges of implementing new policies intended to improve equity in health status or health service delivery. While the appropriateness of the technical content of policies clearly influences whether or not they promote equity, policy analysis theory suggests that it is important to consider how the processes of policy development and implementation influence policy achievements.Drawing on actor analysis and implementation theory, we seek to understand some of the dynamics surrounding the proposed implementation of one set of South African staff allocation strategies responding to broader equity-oriented policy mandates. These proposals were developed by a team of researchers and mid-level managers in 2003 and called for the reallocation of staff between better- and lesser-resourced districts in the Cape Town Metropolitan region to reduce broader resource allocation inequities. This was felt necessary because up to 70 of public health expenditure was on staff, and new financing for health care was unavailable.We focus on the views and reactions of the two sets of implementing actors most directly influenced by the proposed staff reallocation strategies: district health managers and clinic nurses. One strength of this analysis is that it gives voice to the experience of the district level - the key but much neglected implementation arena in a decentralized health system. The paper's findings unpack differences in these actors' positions on the proposed strategies, and explore the factors influencing their positions. Ultimately, we show how a lack of trust in the relationships between mid-level managers and nurse service providers influenced the potential to implement a specific set of equity-oriented strategies. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
机译:当前有关中低收入国家公平问题的许多研究都侧重于发现和描述卫生状况和卫生服务提供方面的不平等程度。在对不平等现象的政策回应方面,关于资源再分配战略的工作越来越多。但是,关于实施旨在提高健康状况或卫生服务公平性的新政策的挑战,已发表的工作很少。尽管政策的技术内容的适当性显然会影响政策是否促进公平,但政策分析理论认为,重要的是要考虑政策制定和实施过程如何影响政策成就。借助行为者分析和实施理论,我们寻求了解围绕拟议的一套南非工作人员分配战略的实施情况所采取的动力,以应对更广泛的以权益为导向的政策任务。这些建议是由一组研究人员和中层管理人员于2003年提出的,要求在开普敦都会区的资源更好和资源较少的地区之间重新分配人员,以减少更广泛的资源分配不均。之所以认为这是必要的,是因为多达70%的公共卫生支出用于员工,并且无法获得新的医疗保健资金。我们关注受拟议的员工重新分配策略最直接影响的两类实施方的观点和反应:健康经理和诊所护士。这种分析的优势之一在于,它使地区级的经验得到了表达,这是分散式卫生系统中的关键但被忽视的实施领域。本文的发现揭示了这些参与者在拟议策略中立场的差异,并探讨了影响其立场的因素。最终,我们显示了对中层管理人员和护士服务提供者之间关系的不信任如何影响实施一套特定的以股权为导向的战略的潜力。牛津大学出版社与伦敦卫生与热带医学院联合出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号