首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >The economic cost to households of childhood malaria in Papua New Guinea: A focus on intra-country variation
【24h】

The economic cost to households of childhood malaria in Papua New Guinea: A focus on intra-country variation

机译:巴布亚新几内亚儿童疟疾家庭的经济成本:关注国家内部差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background We compare direct and indirect household costs associated with malaria treatment for children <3 years in two provinces of Papua New Guinea. In particular, we explore the role of uncertainty around mean household costs and whether assuming a normal distribution for household costs limits the accuracy of any direct cost comparisons. Methods Exit surveys were undertaken at inpatient and outpatient health facilities. In order to handle uncertainty and facilitate comparisons, parametric and non-parametric bootstrap methods were used to estimate direct and indirect costs at the individual data level. The inpatient and outpatient incremental costs from Madang and Maprik health facilities were compared and significant differences between provinces were identified. Results Differences were noted between provinces for both inpatient and outpatient household costs. Total arithmetic mean costs for an outpatient malaria episode were US$7.54 in Madang and US$9.20 in Maprik. Total mean inpatient malaria episode costs were US$25.20 in Madang and US$14.08 in Maprik. As cost distributions were not normal, non-parametric bootstrap techniques were used for cost comparisons. Total household costs per outpatient episode of malaria were lower, although not significantly, in Maprik than in Madang (incremental cost of US$-1.67; 95 CI-4.16, 0.31), while total household costs per inpatient episode were significantly higher in Madang than in Maprik (difference of US$11.16; 95 CI 5.47, 25.33). A difference was noted between provinces in the proportion of indirect costs in total household costs for an outpatient visit: 76 in Madang vs 94 in Maprik. The proportion for indirect costs associated with inpatient visits varied less: 63 in Madang vs 68 in Maprik. Conclusions Intra-country differences need to be considered in estimating household costs for both outpatient and inpatient malaria treatment. Our findings suggest that it is important to recognize the impact of both direct and indirect costs on individuals' capacity to afford treatment. Certain indirect costs are difficult to measure accurately, particularly respondents' interpretations of their productive versus non-productive time. Despite this, exploring intra-country cost variation can provide important information to health policy makers. Malariahousehold costsintra-country variation
机译:背景我们比较了巴布亚新几内亚两个省与3岁以下儿童的疟疾治疗相关的直接和间接家庭费用。特别是,我们探讨了平均家庭成本周围不确定性的作用,以及假设家庭成本的正态分布是否会限制任何直接成本比较的准确性。方法在住院和门诊医疗机构进行出院调查。为了处理不确定性并促进比较,使用了参数和非参数引导程序方法来估计各个数据级别的直接和间接成本。比较了Madang和Maprik卫生机构的住院和门诊增量费用,并确定了各省之间的显着差异。结果各省之间的住院和门诊家庭费用存在差异。门诊疟疾发作的算术平均总费用在马丹为7.54美元,在马普里克为9.20美元。 Madang的平均住院疟疾总费用为25.20美元,Maprik为14.08美元。由于成本分布不正常,因此将非参数自举技术用于成本比较。在马普里克,每次门诊疟疾的家庭总成本比马当省要低,尽管并不明显(增加成本为1.67美元; 95 CI-4.16,0.31),而在马当省,每次住院的总家庭成本却比马当高得多。在Maprik(相差11.16美元; 95 CI 5.47,25.33)。在各省之间,门诊就诊的间接费用在家庭总费用中所占的比例有所不同:马当(Madan)为76,马普里克(Maprik)为94。与住院就诊相关的间接费用所占比例差异较小:马当(Madan)为63,马普里克(Maprik)为68。结论在估计门诊和住院疟疾治疗的家庭费用时,需要考虑国家间的差异。我们的发现表明,重要的是要认识到直接和间接费用对个人负担能力的影响。某些间接成本难以准确衡量,尤其是受访者对其生产时间与非生产时间的解释。尽管如此,探索国家内部成本差异仍可为卫生政策制定者提供重要信息。疟疾家庭成本国内变化

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号