...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Avian and pandemic human influenza policy in South-East Asia: The interface between economic and public health imperatives
【24h】

Avian and pandemic human influenza policy in South-East Asia: The interface between economic and public health imperatives

机译:东南亚的禽流感和大流行性人类流感政策:经济与公共卫生需求之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyse the contemporary policies regarding avian and human pandemic influenza control in three South-East Asia countries: Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam. An analysis of poultry vaccination policy was used to explore the broader policy of influenza A H5N1 control in the region. The policy of antiviral stockpiling with oseltamivir, a scarce regional resource, was used to explore human pandemic influenza preparedness policy. Several policy analysis theories were applied to analyse the debate on the use of vaccination for poultry and stockpiling of antiviral drugs in each country case study. We conducted a comparative analysis across emergent themes.The study found that whilst Indonesia and Vietnam introduced poultry vaccination programmes, Thailand rejected this policy approach. By contrast, all three countries adopted similar strategic policies for antiviral stockpiling in preparation. In relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza, economic imperatives are of critical importance. Whilst Thailand's poultry industry is large and principally an export economy, Vietnam's and Indonesia's are for domestic consumption. The introduction of a poultry vaccination policy in Thailand would have threatened its potential to trade and had a major impact on its economy. Powerful domestic stakeholders in Vietnam and Indonesia, by contrast, were concerned less about international trade and more about maintaining a healthy domestic poultry population. Evidence on vaccination was drawn upon differently depending upon strategic economic positioning either to support or oppose the policy.With influenza A H5N1 endemic in some countries of the region, these policy differences raise questions around regional coherence of policies and the pursuit of an agreed overarching goal, be that eradication or mitigation. Moreover, whilst economic imperatives have been critically important in guiding policy formulation in the agriculture sector, questions arise regarding whether agriculture sectoral policy is coherent with public health sectoral policy across the region.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析东南亚三个国家(泰国,印度尼西亚和越南)关于禽流感和人类大流行性流感控制的当代政策。通过对家禽疫苗接种政策的分析,探讨了该地区控制A H5N1流感的更广泛政策。使用奥司他韦(一种稀缺的地区性资源)进行抗病毒储备的政策被用于探索人类大流行性流感的防范政策。在每个国家的案例研究中,采用了几种政策分析理论来分析关于在禽类中使用疫苗和抗病毒药物库存的辩论。我们对新兴主题进行了比较分析,研究发现,虽然印度尼西亚和越南引入了家禽疫苗接种计划,但泰国拒绝了这种政策方法。相比之下,这三个国家在准备抗病毒药物时都采取了类似的战略政策。对于高致病性禽流感,经济上的紧迫性至关重要。虽然泰国的家禽业规模庞大,并且主要是出口经济,但越南和印度尼西亚的家禽消费却是国内消费。泰国实行家禽疫苗接种政策将威胁其贸易潜力,并对其经济产生重大影响。相比之下,越南和印度尼西亚强大的国内利益相关者对国际贸易的关注较少,而对保持国内家禽健康的关注则更多。疫苗接种的证据来自不同的战略经济定位,以支持或反对该政策。在该地区一些国家中,由于甲型H5N1流感为地方性流行,这些政策差异引发了围绕区域政策一致性和实现议定总体目标的问题。 ,是根除还是缓解。此外,尽管经济上的紧迫性对于指导农业部门的政策制定至关重要,但人们仍对农业部门的政策是否与整个地区的公共卫生部门的政策保持一致提出了疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号