首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Reimbursement decisions in health policy--extending our understanding of the elements of decision-making.
【24h】

Reimbursement decisions in health policy--extending our understanding of the elements of decision-making.

机译:卫生政策中的报销决策-扩展了我们对决策要素的理解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Previous theoretical and empirical work on health policy decisions about reimbursement focuses on specific rationales such as effectiveness, economic considerations and equal access for equal needs. As reimbursement decisions take place in a social and political context we propose that the analysis of decision-making should incorporate factors, which go beyond those commonly discussed. As an example we chose three health technologies (sildenafil, rivastigmine and statins) to investigate how decisions about reimbursement of medicines are made in the United Kingdom National Health Service and what factors influence these decisions. From face-to-face, in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 20 regional and national policy makers and stakeholders we identified two dimensions of decision-making, which extend beyond the rationales conventionally cited. The first dimension relates to the role of 'subjectivity' or 'the personal' in the decisions, including personal experiences of the condition and excitement about the novelty or potential benefit of the technology-these factors affect what counts as evidence, or how evidence is interpreted, in practice. The second dimension relates to the social and political function of decision-making and broadens what counts as the relevant ends of decision-making to include such things as maintaining relationships, avoiding organisational burden, generating politically and legally defensible decisions and demonstrating the willingness to care. More importantly, we will argue that these factors should not be treated as contaminants of an otherwise rational decision-making. On the contrary we suggest that they seem relevant, reasonable and also of substantial importance in considering in decision-making. Complementing the analysis of decision-making about reimbursement by incorporating these factors could increase our understanding and potentially improve decision-making.
机译:先前有关报销卫生政策决策的理论和实证工作着眼于特定的基本原理,例如有效性,经济考虑和平等获得平等需求的机会。由于报销决策是在社会和政治环境中进行的,因此我们建议对决策的分析应包括超出通常讨论的因素的因素。例如,我们选择了三种卫生技术(西地那非,卡巴拉汀和他汀类药物)来调查英国国家卫生局如何做出有关药物报销的决策,以及哪些因素会影响这些决策。通过对20个地区和国家政策制定者及利益相关者进行有针对性的抽样调查,我们进行了面对面的深入访谈,确定了决策的两个方面,这些方面超出了常规引用的理由。第一个维度与“主观性”或“个人”在决策中的作用有关,包括个人对条件的体验以及对技术的新颖性或潜在利益的兴奋-这些因素影响着什么被视为证据,或者证据如何被证明。在实践中进行解释。第二个方面与决策的社会和政治功能有关,并扩大了决策的相关目的,包括维持关系,避免组织负担,产生政治上和法律上可辩护的决定以及表现出关心的意愿等。 。更重要的是,我们将争辩说,不应将这些因素视为原本合理决策的污染物。相反,我们建议它们在决策中考虑时似乎相关,合理并且也具有重要意义。通过纳入这些因素来补充有关报销决策的分析,可以增进我们的理解并有可能改善决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号