首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Incorporation of public hospitals: a 'silver bullet' against overcapacity, managerial bottlenecks and resource constraints? Case studies from Austria and Estonia.
【24h】

Incorporation of public hospitals: a 'silver bullet' against overcapacity, managerial bottlenecks and resource constraints? Case studies from Austria and Estonia.

机译:合并公立医院:应对产能过剩,管理瓶颈和资源紧张的“银弹”?奥地利和爱沙尼亚的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a new approach for incorporating public hospitals by contrasting the experience from an "old" EU country (Austria) with a new EU member state (Estonia). In the EU (including the new member states) hospital overcapacity is a serious problem, from a technical, fiscal and political perspective. Few countries have succeeded in establishing an appropriate framework for resource management and for guaranteeing long-term financial viability of their hospital network. Many countries are in search of effective policies for improved hospital management and more cost-effective resource use in the health sector. Over the past decade, experiences in Austria and Estonia have emerged as innovative examples which may provide lessons for other EU countries and beyond. This paper describes the evolution of public hospitals from public budgetary units and public management to incorporated autonomous organizations under private corporate law, resulting in a contractual relationship between (public) owners and private hospital management. Outdated and inefficient public sector structures were replaced by more agile corporate management. The arrangement allows for investments, operating costs and budgeting according to strategic business goals as opposed to political "fiat". Shielding hospitals from local political influence is an important aspect of this concept. Horizontal integration through networking of public hospitals and introducing private management helps create a new corporate culture, allowing for more flexibility to achieve efficiencies through downsizing and economies of scale. Based on contracts the new balance between ownership and managerial functions create strong incentives for a more business-like, results-oriented and consumer-friendly management. This was achieved both in Austria and Estonia in a politically sensitive way, adopting a long-term vision and by protecting the interests of hospital owners and staff.
机译:本文通过对比“旧”欧盟国家(奥地利)和新欧盟成员国(爱沙尼亚)的经验,提出了一种合并公立医院的新方法。从技术,财政和政治角度来看,在欧盟(包括新成员国),医院的产能过剩是一个严重的问题。很少有国家成功建立适当的资源管理框架并保证其医院网络的长期财务可行性。许多国家正在寻找有效的政策,以改善卫生保健部门的医院管理和更具成本效益的资源使用。在过去的十年中,奥地利和爱沙尼亚的经验已成为创新的例子,可以为其他欧盟国家及其他国家提供经验教训。本文描述了公立医院从公共预算单位和公共管理向私有公司法下的法人自治组织的演变,从而导致(公立)所有者与私立医院管理之间的合同关系。过时且效率低下的公共部门结构被更敏捷的公司管理所取代。这种安排允许根据战略业务目标而不是政治“法令”进行投资,运营成本和预算。使医院免受当地政治影响是这个概念的重要方面。通过公立医院网络的横向整合和引入私人管理有助于创建一种新的企业文化,从而通过缩小规模和规模经济实现更大的灵活性以实现效率。基于合同,所有权和管理职能之间的新平衡为建立更具业务性,成果导向和消费者友好型管理提供了强有力的动力。在奥地利和爱沙尼亚,这是通过政治上敏感的方式实现的,它采取了长远的眼光并保护了医院所有者和医护人员的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号