首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases >Covered Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Versus Endoscopic Therapy plus beta-blocker for Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding
【24h】

Covered Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Versus Endoscopic Therapy plus beta-blocker for Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding

机译:覆盖颈静脉内肝内门体分流术与内镜治疗加β-受体阻滞剂预防静脉曲张出血

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as a high rebleeding risk. Limited data are available on the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents in patients receiving standard endoscopic, vasoactive, and antibiotic treatment. In this multicenter randomized trial, long-term endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) or glue injection + beta-blocker treatment was compared with TIPS placement in 72 patients with a first or second episode of gastric and/or esophageal variceal bleeding, after hemodynamic stabilization upon endoscopic, vasoactive, and antibiotic treatment. Randomization was stratified according to Child-Pugh score. Kaplan-Meier (event-free) survival estimates were used for the endpoints rebleeding, death, treatment failure, and hepatic encephalopathy. During a median follow-up of 23 months, 10 (29%) of 35 patients in the endoscopy + beta-blocker group, as compared to 0 of 37 (0%) patients in the TIPS group, developed variceal rebleeding (P = 0.001). Mortality (TIPS 32% vs. endoscopy 26%; P = 0.418) and treatment failure (TIPS 38% vs. endoscopy 34%; P = 0.685) did not differ between groups. Early hepatic encephalopathy (within 1 year) was significantly more frequent in the TIPS group (35% vs. 14%; P = 0.035), but during longterm follow-up this difference diminished (38% vs. 23%; P = 0.121). Conclusions: In unselected patients with cirrhosis, who underwent successful endoscopic hemostasis for variceal bleeding, covered TIPS was superior to EVL + beta-blocker for reduction of variceal rebleeding, but did not improve survival. TIPS was associated with higher rates of early hepatic encephalopathy.
机译:肝硬化患者的胃食管静脉曲张破裂出血与明显的发病率和死亡率以及高再出血风险有关。在接受标准的内镜,血管活性和抗生素治疗的患者中,关于带盖支架的经颈肝内门体系统分流术(TIPS)的作用尚无足够的数据。在这项多中心随机试验中,比较了长期内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)或胶水注射+β受体阻滞剂治疗与TIPS放置在72例第一次或第二次胃和/或食管静脉曲张破裂出血的患者中的相关性。内镜,血管活性和抗生素治疗。根据Child-Pugh评分对随机分组进行分层。 Kaplan-Meier(无事件)生存率评估用于再出血,死亡,治疗失败和肝性脑病的终点。在23个月的中位随访期间,内镜+β受体阻滞剂组的35例患者中有10例(29%),而TIPS组的37例(0%)患者中有0例发生了静脉曲张再出血(P = 0.001 )。两组之间的死亡率(TIPS为32%,内窥镜检查为26%; P = 0.418)和治疗失败(TIPS 38%,内窥镜检查为34%; P = 0.685)没有差异。在TIPS组中,早期肝性脑病(1年以内)的发生率明显更高(35%vs. 14%; P = 0.035),但是在长期随访期间,这种差异有所减少(38%vs. 23%; P = 0.121)。 。结论:未选择的肝硬化患者经内镜止血成功治疗了静脉曲张破裂出血,在减少静脉曲张再出血方面,覆盖的TIPS优于EVL +β受体阻滞剂,但并未提高生存率。 TIPS与早期肝性脑病的发生率更高相关。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号