...
首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases >Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic decompensation: a randomized, open-label study.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic decompensation: a randomized, open-label study.

机译:恩替卡韦与阿德福韦在慢性乙型肝炎肝失代偿患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机,开放标签研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A randomized, open-label comparative study of entecavir versus adefovir therapy was performed in subjects with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatic decompensation (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score >/=7). Adult subjects were randomized and treated (n = 191) with entecavir 1.0 mg or adefovir 10 mg daily for up to 96 weeks from the date of last subject randomization. Subjects were positive or negative for hepatitis B e antigen and experienced or naive for treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, as determined by polymerase chain reaction, at week 24, adjusted for baseline HBV DNA and lamivudine resistance status by linear regression analysis. Entecavir demonstrated superiority to adefovir for this endpoint (treatment difference 1.74 log(10) copies/mL [95% confidence interval -2.30, -1.18]; P < 0.0001). The entecavir group showed a greater change from baseline in HBV DNA at all time points through week 48 and a higher proportion of subjects who achieved HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL at weeks 24 (entecavir 49%; adefovir 16%; P < 0.0001) and 48 (entecavir 57%; adefovir 20%; P < 0.0001). Approximately two-thirds of subjects in both groups showed improvement/stabilization in Child-Turcotte-Pugh status. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score change at week 48 was -2.6 for entecavir and -1.7 for adefovir. Adverse event rates were comparable between groups. Cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma rates were 12% for entecavir and 20% for adefovir. Cumulative death rates were 23% for entecavir and 33% for adefovir. Week 24 mortality rates were 12% for both groups. conclusion: Entecavir demonstrated superior virologic efficacy to adefovir in a population of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatic decompensation. Biochemical and clinical benefits were also demonstrated. Entecavir was well tolerated, and early mortality rates were consistent with rates observed in similar populations treated with lamivudine.
机译:对患有肝代偿失调(Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分> / = 7)的慢性乙型肝炎患者进行了恩替卡韦与阿德福韦疗法的随机,开放标签比较研究。将成人受试者随机分组,并自上次受试者随机分组之日起,每天最多接受96周的恩替卡韦1.0 mg或阿德福韦10 mg治疗(n = 191)。受试者对乙型肝炎e抗原呈阳性或阴性,并有经验或天真地接受核苷类似物治疗。主要功效终点是通过聚合酶链反应测定的第24周血清乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)DNA的平均减少,并通过线性回归分析对基线HBV DNA和拉米夫定耐药状态进行了调整。恩替卡韦在该终点指标上优于阿德福韦(治疗差异1.74 log(10)拷贝/ mL [95%置信区间-2.30,-1.18]; P <0.0001)。恩替卡韦组在第48周之前的所有时间点均显示出从基线开始的HBV DNA基线变化较大,并且在第24周达到HBV DNA <300拷贝/ mL的受试者比例更高(恩替卡韦49%;阿德福韦16%; P <0.0001) 48(恩替卡韦57%;阿德福韦20%; P <0.0001)。两组中约三分之二的受试者表现出Child-Turcotte-Pugh状态的改善/稳定。在48周时,恩替卡韦的终末期肝病评分变化模型为-2.6,阿德福韦为-1.7。两组之间的不良事件发生率相当。恩替卡韦和阿德福韦的累积肝细胞癌发生率分别为12%和20%。恩替卡韦的累积死亡率为23%,阿德福韦的累积死亡率为33%。两组的第24周死亡率均为12%。结论:恩替卡韦在具有肝代偿失调的慢性乙型肝炎患者中显示出比阿德福韦更强的病毒学疗效。还证明了生化和临床益处。恩替卡韦耐受性良好,早期死亡率与拉米夫定治疗相似人群的观察到的死亡率一致。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号