...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Physics: Official Journal of the Health Physics Society >Contamination Analysis of Radioactive Samples in Focused Ion Beam Instruments
【24h】

Contamination Analysis of Radioactive Samples in Focused Ion Beam Instruments

机译:聚焦离子束仪器中放射性样品的污染分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of Focused Ion Beam (FIB) instrument's to analyze and prepare samples that are radioactive requires atten-tiveness to the materials that are dislodged and free inside the chamber. Radioactive sputtered material must be understood even when observed at trace concentrations. Measurements using liquid scintillation counting and high purity germanium detectors were used to evaluate contamination on accessible surfaces inside a focused ion beam chamber that was used in the preparation of samples that were radioactive. The maximum removable contamination found was 0.27 0.4 Bq cm~(-2), on the focused ion beam wall with 0.24 0.019 Bq cm~(-2) on the door. Although these magnitudes of removable contamination are inconsequential for activation products, these same magnitudes of actinides, for example ~239Pu, would represent 3.2% of an Annual Limit of Intake. This might be considered significant if one examines the relatively infrequent use of this device for the preparation ofradioactive samples. Predicted activities of sputtered material were found using the software Transport of Ions in Matter, estimating that 0.003% of a radioactive samples activity is released into the FIB chamber. A used secondary electron detector's activity was measured to be 383.7 8.1 Bq. Preferential build-up of sputtered materials due to temperature or static charge gradients was considered. No temperature gradients were observed. Static charge gradients were measured inside the chamber varying between 0.057% below the mean to 34% higher than the mean. However, the magnitudes of contamination measured did not correlate to static charge gradients. Deposition in the chamber appears to have no mechanical cause but rather is sporadic however, measureable. Experience to date has been limited to samples of low activity; nevertheless, contamination inside the chamber was observed. Users should anticipate higher levels of readily dispersible radioactive contamination within the FIB as sample activity increases.
机译:使用聚焦离子束(FIB)仪器来分析和制备放射性样品需要注意移出腔室内自由的材料的注意性。即使以痕量浓度观察,也必须了解放射性溅射材料。使用液体闪烁计数和高纯度锗检测器进行的测量用于评估聚焦离子束腔室内可及表面的污染,该离子束腔用于制备放射性样品。在聚焦离子束壁上发现的最大可去除污染物为0.27 0.4 Bq cm〜(-2),门上为0.24 0.019 Bq cm〜(-2)。尽管这些数量级的可去除污染物对于活化产物无关紧要,但是这些相同级别的act系元素(例如〜239Pu)将占年度摄入限量的3.2%。如果人们检查这种设备相对不经常使用的放射性样品制备方法,这可能被认为是重要的。使用软件“离子在物质中的运输”发现了溅射材料的预计活度,估计有0.003%的放射性样品活度释放到了FIB室中。所使用的二次电子检测器的活性测得为383.7 8.1 Bq。考虑到由于温度或静电荷梯度而导致的溅射材料的优先堆积。没有观察到温度梯度。在室内测量的静电荷梯度在平均值以下0.057%至平均值以上34%之间变化。但是,测得的污染程度与静电荷梯度无关。腔室中的沉积似乎没有机械原因,而是零星的,但是可以测量。迄今为止的经验仅限于低活动性的样本;然而,观察到室内污染。随着样品活度的增加,用户应预料到FIB内易分散放射性污染物的含量会更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号