...
首页> 外文期刊>Health, risk & society >Risk categorisation through standard deviations - the challenge of bone density measurements: A focus group study among women attending the Nord-Tr?ndelag Health Study (HUNT)
【24h】

Risk categorisation through standard deviations - the challenge of bone density measurements: A focus group study among women attending the Nord-Tr?ndelag Health Study (HUNT)

机译:通过标准差进行风险分类-骨密度测量的挑战:参加Nord-Tr?ndelag健康研究(HUNT)的女性进行的焦点小组研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bone density measurements play an important part in the categorisation of osteoporosis as a risk factor in modern medicine. According to the World Health Organization, people are categorised as having osteoporosis when their bone mineral density (BMD) value is 2.5 standard deviation (SD) below the young adult mean value, and as having osteopenia when the value lies between one and 2.5 SDs below the young adult mean value. The categorisation according to SDs makes osteoporosis a rather unique case within the medical world of risk definitions. We invited women who had their bone mass scanned in the Nord-Tr?ndelag Health Study (HUNT) to participate in focus groups and share their scanning experiences. Nine groups of women met three times for a total of 27 focus group discussions. Our findings illustrate that having their BMD measured contributed to a substantial confusion, related in particular to feedback given as SDs, the choice of reference populations and the body sites chosen for BMD. Some of the women had had their BMD measured at different health institutions using different reference groups, which resulted in women being told that they were osteoporotic at one institution, but not at the other. As the different institutions also scanned various body sites, including the wrist, hip and spine, the women were also confused about what site(s) provides the best information about their bone status. Overall this study shows that osteoporosis presents us with a particularly challenging example of risk categorisation.
机译:骨密度测量在骨质疏松症作为现代医学中的危险因素的分类中起着重要的作用。根据世界卫生组织的统计,如果人们的骨矿物质密度(BMD)值比年轻成年人的平均值低2.5标准差(SD),则将其归为骨质疏松症;如果该值低于或低于1至2.5 SDs,则将其归为骨质疏松症。年轻人的均值。根据SD进行的分类使骨质疏松症在风险定义的医学界成为一个相当独特的案例。我们邀请在Nord-Tr?ndelag健康研究(HUNT)中进行了骨质量扫描的女性参加焦点小组讨论并分享她们的扫描经验。 9个妇女小组举行了3次会议,共进行了27次焦点小组讨论。我们的发现表明,对其BMD进行测量会造成严重的混乱,特别是与SD所提供的反馈,参考人群的选择以及为BMD选择的身体部位有关。一些妇女在不同的卫生机构使用不同的参考人群进行了骨密度测量,结果导致妇女被告知她们在一间机构骨质疏松,而另一间则没有。由于不同的机构还扫描了包括腕部,臀部和脊椎在内的各种身体部位,这些妇女还对哪些部位可以提供有关其骨骼状况的最佳信息感到困惑。总体而言,这项研究表明骨质疏松症为我们提供了一个特别具有挑战性的风险分类示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号