首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Positron emission tomography for preoperative staging in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma in lymph node metastasis.
【24h】

Positron emission tomography for preoperative staging in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma in lymph node metastasis.

机译:正电子发射断层扫描术用于局部晚期或转移性结直肠腺癌患者淋巴结转移的术前分期。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The impact of positron emission tomography was prospectively evaluated using 18 (F)-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) for the detection of lymph node (LN) metastasis in preoperative locally advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma, compared with computed tomography (CT) and pathologic findings. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-three patients who were suspected of LN involvement by CT were staged preoperatively for LN metastasis using FDG-PET and CT. Regional LNs were classified into 3 groups, N1, N2-3, and N4, according to the Japanese General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (6th Edition). A comparison of pathologic findings with CT and FDG-PET findings was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT/FDG-PET were 91.3%/52.2%, 91.7%/75.0% and 65.9%/72.3%, respectively, for N1, 91.7%/75.0%, 72.2%/94.4% and 77.1%/89.6%, respectively, for N2-3, and 100%/100%, 17.6%/100% and 41.7%/100%, respectively, for N4. The detection rate of the num ber of metastatic N1 LNs by CT was significantly higher than by FDG-PET, and not significantly in the N2-4 area. LNs hidden by strong halation of the primary tumor were not detected by FDG-PET. CONCLUSIONS: While FDG-PET is markedly more sensitive than CT for detection of N4 LN involve. ment, the number of metastatic LNs is difficult to determine.
机译:背景/目的:与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,使用18(F)-氟-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG-PET)对术前局部晚期大肠腺癌淋巴结(LN)转移的检测进行了前瞻性评估,以评估正电子发射断层扫描的影响。 )和病理结果。方法:对53例CT怀疑LN累及的患者在术前使用FDG-PET和CT进行LN转移。根据日本《结肠癌,直肠癌和肛门癌临床和病理研究通则》(第6版),将区域性LN分为N1,N2-3和N4 3组。将病理结果与CT和FDG-PET结果进行比较,以计算敏感性,特异性和准确性。结果:CT / FDG-PET对N1的敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为91.3%/ 52.2%,91.7%/ 75.0%和65.9%/ 72.3%,而N1分别为91.7%/ 75.0%,72.2%/ 94.4%和N2-3分别为77.1%/ 89.6%,N4分别为100%/ 100%,17.6%/ 100%和41.7%/ 100%。 CT对转移性N1 LNs的检出率明显高于FDG-PET,在N2-4区域不明显。 FDG-PET未检测到原发性肿瘤强烈晕死隐藏的LN。结论:尽管FDG-PET对N4 LN的检测明显比CT灵敏。因此,转移性LN的数量难以确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号