首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >Toward an International Law of the Internet
【24h】

Toward an International Law of the Internet

机译:迈向国际互联网法

获取原文
       

摘要

This Article presents the first in depth analysis of Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as it applies to new technologies and uses this analysis to develop the foundation for an "international law of the Internet." Although Article 19 does not guarantee a right to the "Internet" per se, it explicitly protects the technologies of connection and access to information, and it limits states' ability to burden content originating abroad. The principles derived from Article 19 provide an important normative reorientation on individual rights for both domestic and international Internet governance debates. Article 19's guarantee of a right to the technologies of connection also fills a critical gap in human rights law. Protecting technology allows advocates to intervene in discussions about technological design that affect, but do not themselves violate, international human rights law. Failure to attend to these choices - to weigh in, ahead of time, on the human rights implications of software code, architecture design, and technological standards - can have significant consequences for human rights that may not be easily undone after the fact. The Article also argues that technology companies are key partners in implementing Article 19. First, Article 19 directly binds these actors in some instances. Article 19's drafting history demonstrates that it does not have a state action requirement for dominant private actors. Second, as a pragmatic matter, technology companies can play an important role in enforcing Article 19 because of their central involvement in technology development and standard setting. Decisions about technology can make it easier or harder for states to violate international law, and technology companies should embed "human rights defaults" into their technology by designing it in ways that make it harder for states to violate international human rights.
机译:本文对适用于新技术的《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第19条进行了首次深度分析,并以此分析为“互联网国际法”的发展奠定了基础。尽管第19条本身并不保证“互联网”的权利,但它明确地保护了连接和访问信息的技术,并且限制了国家负担来自国外的内容的能力。从第19条衍生的原则为国内外互联网治理辩论提供了重要的规范性个人取向调整。第19条对连接技术权的保障也填补了人权法中的一个重大空白。保护技术使倡导者可以介入有关技术设计的讨论,这些讨论会影响但不会违反国际人权法。如果不采取这些选择(提前权衡软件代码,体系结构设计和技术标准对人权的影响),可能会对人权产生重大影响,但事后很难轻易撤销。该条款还争辩说,技术公司是实施第19条的主要合作伙伴。首先,在某些情况下,第19条直接约束了这些参与者。第19条的起草历史表明,它对主导的私人行为者没有国家行动的要求。其次,作为一个务实的问题,技术公司可以在执行第19条方面发挥重要作用,因为它们集中参与了技术开发和标准制定。有关技术的决定可能会使国家更容易或更难违反国际法,而技术公司应通过设计使国家更难违反国际人权的方式将“人权违约”嵌入其技术中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号