首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >Conceptualizing China Within the Kantian Peace
【24h】

Conceptualizing China Within the Kantian Peace

机译:在康德和平中概念化中国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Immanuel Kant's 1795 essay, "To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch" (Zum ewigen Frieden), established a concept of cosmopolitan law as the nemesis of war, instilling in generations of thinkers and practitioners a vision of a world without conflict Kant's paradigm posited that "republican constitutions, a commercial spirit of international trade, and a federation of interdependent republics" would provide the basis for a "perpetual peace" amongst states bound together under international law. Yet cultural relativists since the time of Kant have argued that only certain nations - namely those with a "Europeanized" culture - are capable of coming together to secure this lasting peace. This Article seeks to challenge such claims and assess the contemporary relevance of Kant's "perpetual peace" under international law in light of one of the most important geopolitical developments of our time: the rise of China. It is clear today that efforts to secure an enduring world peace without China have limited prospects for success. Amidst this reality, the Article argues that historical and contemporary claims regarding the irreconcilability of the Kantian paradigm with Chinese thought are inaccurate and incomplete. It presents evidence to rebut these cultural relativist arguments by identifying sources of resonance with Kant in classical Chinese political philosophy; highlighting Chinese scholars' ongoing engagement with Kant's writings over the past century; and revealing trends in recent Chinese scholarship and foreign policy discourse that support Kantian liberal internationalism. Finally, the Article demonstrates that modern China is increasingly committed to two pillars of the Kantian project, international institutions and commercial interdependence, but concludes that the rising power must develop a missing third pillar - liberal democracy - if it is to strengthen its normative commitment to international law and participate in a lasting peace amongst states. China's fate and the future of international law thus appear inextricably tied.
机译:依曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)在1795年发表的论文《致永久和平:哲学概论》(Zum ewigen Frieden)建立了国际法概念作为战争的克星,这在几代思想家和实践者中灌输了一个没有冲突的世界的愿景康德的范式认为: “共和宪法,国际贸易的商业精神以及相互依存的共和国的联盟”将为受国际法约束的国家之间的“永久和平”提供基础。然而,自康德时代以来的文化相对论者一直认为,只有某些国家,即具有“欧洲化”文化的国家,才有能力团结起来,以确保持久和平。本文旨在挑战这种主张,并根据我们时代最重要的地缘政治发展之一:中国的崛起,评估康德在国际法下的“永久和平”在当代的意义。今天很明显,在没有中国的情况下确保持久世界和平的努力限制了成功的前景。在这种现实之中,文章认为,关于康德范式与中国思想的不可调和的历史和当代主张是不准确和不完整的。通过确定中国古典政治哲学中与康德的共鸣来源,提供了反驳这些文化相对论论证的证据。强调中国学者在过去一个世纪中对康德著作的持续参与;并揭示了支持康德自由主义国际主义的中国学者和外交政策话语的最新趋势。最后,该条款表明,现代中国日益致力于康德项目的两个支柱,即国际制度和商业相互依存,但得出结论认为,如果要增强其对规范的承诺,则崛起的大国必须建立缺失的第三支柱-自由民主。国际法,参与国家间的持久和平。因此,中国的命运与国际法的未来密不可分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号