首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >The safety and utility of pancreatic duct stents in the emergency ERCP of acute biliary pancreatitis but difficult sphincterotomy
【24h】

The safety and utility of pancreatic duct stents in the emergency ERCP of acute biliary pancreatitis but difficult sphincterotomy

机译:胰管支架在急性胆源性胰腺炎急诊括约肌切开术中的急诊ERCP的安全性和实用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and safety of emergency ERCP and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) patients in whom biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy proved difficult, and to compare the clinical outcome of those patients having emergency ERCP without pancreatic stent. Methodology: One hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients with ABP were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the stent group (n=78) or the no-stent group (n=113). In the stent group, 3-5Fr, 5-7cm-long pancreatic stent insertion was initially applied and removed endoscopically 1-2 weeks post-ER-CP. All patients were hospitalized for medical therapy and were followed-up. Results: Mean age, initial symptom-to-ERCP times, Glasgow severity scores and peak amylase and CRP levels at initial presentation were not significantly different in the stent group vs. the no-stent group, and the selective biliary cannulation was achieved in 80% of the stent group and in 94% of the no-stent group (p=0.15). More importantly, the complication rate was significantly lower in the stent group (7.7% vs. 31.9%). There was no difference in mortality between the two groups statistically (1.3% vs. 3.5%). Conclusions: Pancreatic duct stenting is a safe and effective procedure that may afford sufficient PD decompression to reverse the process of ABP, show better outcomes as compared to no-stent group. It is recommended to reduce the incidence of the complication in the emergency ERCP of ABP but difficult sphincterotomy. However, further prospective trials are needed.
机译:背景/目的:本研究的目的是评估在胆道内镜括约肌切开术困难的急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)患者中,紧急ERCP和胰管(PD)支架置入的可行性和安全性,并比较这些患者的临床结果没有胰腺支架的急诊ERCP患者。方法:本研究共纳入119例ABP患者。将患者随机分为支架组(n = 78)或无支架组(n = 113)。在支架组中,首先进行3-5Fr,5-7cm长的胰腺支架插入,并在ER-CP后1-2周内镜取下。所有患者均入院接受药物治疗并接受随访。结果:支架组与无支架组相比,平均年龄,初次出现症状至ERCP时间,格拉斯哥严重程度评分,峰值淀粉酶和CRP水平在支架组与无支架组之间无显着差异,并且在80例中实现了选择性胆管插管%的支架组和94%的无支架组(p = 0.15)。更重要的是,支架组的并发症发生率显着降低(7.7%比31.9%)。两组之间的死亡率无统计学差异(1.3%对3.5%)。结论:胰管支架置入术是一种安全有效的方法,可提供足够的PD减压以逆转ABP的过程,与无支架组相比,显示出更好的结果。建议减少ABP急诊ERCP但括约肌切开困难的并发症的发生率。但是,还需要进一步的前瞻性试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号