首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >The media of rapid urease test influence the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori.
【24h】

The media of rapid urease test influence the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori.

机译:快速尿素酶检测的培养基会影响幽门螺杆菌的诊断。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The influence of different media on the validity of the rapid urease test, including accuracy, reaction time and cost-effectiveness is evaluated. METHODOLOGY: Biopsies were obtained from the antral and body mucosa of 100 KMUH patients (51 men, 49 women; mean age: 54.0 years, range: 21-79 years old) undergoing gastroendoscopy due to dyspepsia. None of the patients had received any Helicobacter pylori eradicating treatment, nor any other antibiotic or bismuth treatment in the previous one month, nor had they had any type of gastric operation in the past. Helicobacter pylori status was evaluated by seven different tests: culture, histology, home-made rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test, and three different commercially available rapid urease tests--including the CLO test, the ProntoDry test, and the Pyloriset Urease test. Helicobacter pylori status was defined as positive when the culture was positive or if concordance of two of the other three tests (histology, homemade rapid urease test and 13C-urea breath test) was positive. RESULTS: Three different rapid urease tests have similar sensitivities (97.3% vs. 100% vs. 100%) and specificities (98.4% vs. 96.8% vs. 98.2%), and accuracy (98.4% vs. 96.8% vs. 98.2%). But the reaction time was longer in the CLO test than for the other two rapid urease tests (22.3 vs. 5.6 vs. 10.1 minutes) (P < 0.05). The ProntoDry test and the Pyloriset Urease test also have more rapid positive rate than CLO test. However, in vitro study, three tests show similar rapidity of positive reaction at different densities of Helicobacter pylori. CONCLUSIONS: These three tests have practical advantages for physicians who need a rapid and accurate method of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infections. The ProntoDry test and Pyloriset Urease test have degrees of accuracy similar to the CLO test, but results are obtained more rapidly and they are cheaper. Furthermore, The ProntoDry test can be stored at room temperature and thereby save on the storage expense.
机译:背景/目的:评估不同介质对快速尿素酶测试有效性的影响,包括准确性,反应时间和成本效益。方法:从因消化不良而接受胃内镜检查的100名KMUH患者(51名男性,49名女性;平均年龄:54.0岁,范围:21-79岁)的肛门和身体粘膜上进行活检。在过去的一个月中,没有患者接受过幽门螺杆菌根除治疗,也没有任何其他抗生素或铋治疗,过去也没有进行过任何类型的胃手术。幽门螺杆菌的状态通过七种不同的测试进行评估:培养,组织学,自制的快速尿素酶测试,13C尿素呼气测试以及三种不同的市售快速尿素酶测试-包括CLO测试,ProntoDry测试和幽门螺杆菌脲酶测试。当培养阳性或其他三个测试(组织学,自制快速尿素酶测试和13C-尿素呼气测试)中两个测试的一致性为阳性时,幽门螺杆菌状态定义为阳性。结果:三种不同的快速脲酶测试具有相似的敏感性(97.3%vs. 100%vs. 100%)和特异性(98.4%vs. 96.8%vs. 98.2%)和准确性(98.4%vs. 96.8%vs. 98.2%) )。但是在CLO测试中,反应时间比其他两次快速尿素酶测试(22.3 vs. 5.6 vs. 10.1分钟)更长(P <0.05)。 ProntoDry检验和幽门螺杆菌脲酶检验的阳性率也比CLO检验更快。但是,在体外研究中,三个测试显示了在不同密度的幽门螺杆菌下阳性反应的相似速度。结论:这三种测试对于需要快速,准确的诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的方法的医生具有实用的优势。 ProntoDry检验和Pyloriset脲酶检验的准确性与CLO检验相似,但是可以更快地获得结果,而且价格便宜。此外,ProntoDry测试可以在室温下保存,从而节省了保存费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号