首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Diagnosis and treatment of bleeding colonic diverticula.
【24h】

Diagnosis and treatment of bleeding colonic diverticula.

机译:结肠憩室出血的诊断和治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonic diverticula are the most frequent cause of major lower intestinal bleeding and pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the attending physician. Emergency surgical resection is associated with a high mortality and morbidity and patients who will stop bleeding spontaneously cannot be distinguished from those who will continue to bleed. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of barium enema as a sole less invasive treatment option for severe diverticular bleeding. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated 102 patients admitted with colonic diverticular bleeding, from 1993 to 1997, who needed transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. We compared the clinical efficacy of surgical resection, conservative treatment, and therapeutic barium enema with regard to the cessation of bleeding, morbidity, mortality, and rebleeding rate. The therapeutic strategies used after further episodes of bleeding were also registered. RESULTS: Transfusion requirements were highest in patients who underwent surgical treatment, while the least amount of blood was required by the barium enema group (6.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.5 units of blood). However, the quantity of transfused blood did not correlate with the initial hemoglobin level, which was highest in the conservative treatment group and lowest in the operative group (9.0 +/- 1.2 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.3 g/dL). These data support the fact that the most severe bleeding would necessitate surgical resection and that therapeutic barium enema may be considered more effective than conservative treatments. With regard to the outcome of treatment, conservative treatment led to a rebleeding rate of 43.3%, which differed significantly from a 15.9% rebleeding rate after therapeutic barium enema (P = 0.009). No rebleeding was registered in surgically treated patients. Sixty percent of patients in whom therapeutic barium enema failed were treated by colonic resection without mortality, while 77% of patients who had rebleeding after conservative treatment were successfully treated with barium enema. Overall, barium enema was the most frequently applied second-line treatment (56.5%). The mortality after surgery was significantly higher than that after other treatment modalities (33% vs. 1%; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: If diverticular bleeding is clinically suspected as the cause of major lower intestinal hemorrhage, barium enema is a more promising alternative than conservative treatment because of diagnostic and therapeutic importance in the long-term. In the event of urgent secondary surgery following the failure of barium enema to stop bleeding, we recommend a sigmoidoscopy and, optionally, an angiography before surgery in order to first localize the bleeding. We conclude that therapeutic barium enema is the treatment of choice for the first bleeding episode, while surgical resection should be performed if rebleeding occurs.
机译:背景/目的:结肠憩室是引起下肠道大出血的最常见原因,对主治医师构成了诊断和治疗挑战。紧急手术切除会导致较高的死亡率和发病率,无法自发停止出血的患者与会继续出血的患者无法区分开。我们的目的是评估钡灌肠作为严重憩室出血唯一的微创治疗方案的疗效。方法:我们评估了1993年至1997年间102例需要输注2个或更多单位血液的结肠憩室出血患者。我们比较了手术切除,保守治疗和钡剂灌肠治疗在止血,发病率,死亡率和再出血率方面的临床疗效。还记录了进一步出血后使用的治疗策略。结果:接受外科手术治疗的患者的输血需求最高,而钡灌肠组的血液需求最少(6.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.5单位血液)。但是,输血量与初始血红蛋白水平无关,在保守治疗组中最高,而在手术组中最低(9.0 +/- 1.2 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.3 g / dL)。这些数据支持以下事实:最严重的出血将需要进行手术切除,并且可以认为治疗性钡剂灌肠比保守治疗更有效。关于治疗的结果,保守治疗导致再出血率为43.3%,与钡剂灌肠后再出血的15.9%有显着差异(P = 0.009)。接受手术治疗的患者未再出血。钡剂灌肠治疗失败的患者中有60%接受了结肠切除术而无死亡,而保守治疗后再出血的患者中有77%成功地接受了钡剂灌肠治疗。总体而言,钡灌肠是最常用的二线治疗(56.5%)。手术后的死亡率显着高于其他治疗方式(33%比1%; P = 0.0001)。结论:如果临床上怀疑憩室出血是主要的下消化道出血的原因,那么从长期来看,钡剂灌肠比保守治疗是更有希望的替代方法,因为它对诊断和治疗具有重要意义。如果钡灌肠失败后不能进行紧急第二次手术以止血,我们建议在手术前先行乙状结肠镜检查,必要时行血管造影术以首先确定出血的位置。我们的结论是,治疗性钡剂灌肠是首次出血发作的首选治疗方法,如果发生再出血,则应进行手术切除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号