首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Are twelve days of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin better than six days for treating H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer and in non-ulcer dyspepsia?
【24h】

Are twelve days of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin better than six days for treating H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer and in non-ulcer dyspepsia?

机译:奥美拉唑,阿莫西林和克拉霉素的十二天治疗消化性溃疡和非溃疡性消化不良的幽门螺杆菌感染是否比六天好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate whether omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 12 days is more effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication than the same regimen for only 6 days; and to verify whether these eradication regimens are more effective in peptic ulcer disease than in non-ulcer dyspepsia. METHODOLOGY: We studied 411 patients in whom a gastroscopy was carried out due to symptoms related to the upper gastrointestinal tract and who were diagnosed with duodenal ulcer (175 patients, 43%), gastric ulcer (42 patients, 10%), or non-ulcer dyspepsia (194 patients, 47%), and concomitant infection by H. pylori. At endoscopy, biopsies were obtained for rapid urease test, and a 13C-urea breath test was carried out. Urea breath test was repeated four weeks after completing eradication treatment with 1) omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) and clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) for six days (239 patients), or 2) the same regimen for 12 days (172 patients). RESULTS: H. pylori eradication was achieved in 73.6% (95% CI, 68-79%) of the patients treated during 6 days, and in 84.3% (79-90%) of those receiving 12 days of therapy (P < 0.01). The overall eradication rate with both regimens (6 plus 12 days), respectively in patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia, was 84.6% (79-90%), 75.6% (61-86%), and 72.8% (67-79%) (P < 0.01 when comparing duodenal ulcer vs. non-ulcer dyspepsia). Twelve-day regimen was more effective than 6-day regimen only in non-ulcer dyspepsia (62% vs. 83%, P < 0.01), but not in duodenal or gastric ulcer. In the multivariate analysis the duration (6 vs. 12 days) of eradication therapy (odds ratio: 2.2; 1.3-3.7) and the type of disease (duodenal ulcer vs. non-ulcer dyspepsia; odds ratio: 2.3; 1.3-3.8) were the only variables which influenced on H. pylori eradication efficacy (chi 2 model, 17; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy with omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen in patients with duodenal ulcer is higher than in those patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. The increase of H. pylori eradication rate by 21% in our non-ulcer dyspepsia patients justifies the prolongation from 6 to 12 days of omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy, whilst the increase of cure rates in duodenal or gastric ulcer patients with a 12-day therapy would not be cost-effective.
机译:背景/目的:评价奥美拉唑,阿莫西林和克拉霉素是否在12天内比同一方案仅6天更有效地根除幽门螺杆菌;并验证这些根除方案在消化性溃疡疾病中比在非溃疡性消化不良中是否更有效。方法:我们研究了411例因与上消化道相关的症状进行了胃镜检查并且被诊断出患有十二指肠溃疡(175例,43%),胃溃疡(42例,10%)或非胃溃疡的患者。溃疡性消化不良(194例患者,占47%),并伴有幽门螺杆菌感染。在内窥镜检查中,获得活组织检查用于快速尿素酶测试,并进行了13C-尿素呼气测试。用1)奥美拉唑(20 mg两次),阿莫西林(1 g两次)和克拉霉素(500 mg两次)完成根除治疗后四周重复尿素呼气试验,共六天(239例患者),或2)相同方案共12次天(172例患者)。结果:在6天内接受治疗的患者中,有73.6%(95%CI,68-79%)的患者已根除幽门螺杆菌,在接受12天治疗的患者中有84.3%(79-90%)的患者得以根除(P <0.01 )。十二指肠溃疡,胃溃疡和非溃疡性消化不良患者的两种治疗方案(6天和12天)的总根除率分别为84.6%(79-90%),75.6%(61-86%)和72.8 %(67-79%)(当比较十二指肠溃疡与非溃疡性消化不良时,P <0.01)。仅在非溃疡性消化不良中,十二天方案比六天方案更有效(62%比83%,P <0.01),但在十二指肠或胃溃疡中则无效。在多因素分析中,根除治疗的持续时间(6天与12天)(几率:2.2; 1.3-3.7)和疾病类型(十二指肠溃疡与非溃疡性消化不良;优势比:2.3; 1.3-3.8)是影响幽门螺杆菌根除功效的唯一变量(chi 2模型,17; P <0.001)。结论:奥美拉唑-阿莫西林-克拉霉素治疗十二指肠溃疡患者的疗效高于非溃疡性消化不良患者。非溃疡性消化不良患者的幽门螺杆菌根除率提高21%,证明奥美拉唑-阿莫西林-克拉霉素治疗从6天延长到12天是合理的,而十二指肠或胃溃疡的12-日间疗法将不具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号