首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review
【24h】

Resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review

机译:肝癌肝切除术的切除切缘:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: To evaluate the influence of the width of resection margin on recurrence and survival for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methodology: Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized trials evaluating the influence of the width of resection margin for HCC were identified using a predefined search strategy. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled recurrence and survival rate. Results: One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized trials were identified. The only randomized controlled trial reported that a margin aiming at 2cm could decrease the recurrence rate (p=0.037) and increase the 3-year survival (p=0.02) and 5-year survival rate (p<0.01) compared with a margin aiming at 1cm. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the group with resection margin 1cm in recurrence rate (p=0.08), 1-year survival (p=0.75), 3-year survival (p=0.53) and 5-year survival rate (p=0.15). Conclusions: A resection margin >1cm does not provide significant prognostic benefit compared with a resection margin
机译:背景/目的:评估切除边缘宽度对肝细胞癌复发和生存的影响。方法:采用预先确定的搜索策略,确定了评估切除余量宽度对肝癌影响的随机对照试验和非随机试验。进行荟萃分析以估计合并的复发率和生存率。结果:确定了一项随机对照试验和四项非随机试验。唯一的随机对照试验报道,与切缘定位相比,切缘2cm可以降低复发率(p = 0.037),并提高3年生存率(p = 0.02)和5年生存率(p <0.01)。在1厘米。荟萃分析显示,切缘<1cm的组与切缘> 1cm的组的复发率(p = 0.08),1年生存率(p = 0.75),3年生存率(p = 0.08)无显着差异。 p = 0.53)和5年生存率(p = 0.15)。结论:与小于1cm的切除边缘相比,大于1cm的切除边缘不能提供明显的预后益处。仅有有限的证据表明,以切缘为2cm的患者比以切缘为1cm的患者具有更好的生存结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号