...
首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >A randomised controlled trial of the use of aciclovir and/or prednisolone for the early treatment of Bell's palsy: the BELLS study.
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial of the use of aciclovir and/or prednisolone for the early treatment of Bell's palsy: the BELLS study.

机译:使用阿昔洛韦和/或泼尼松龙早期治疗贝尔麻痹的随机对照试验:BELLS研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether oral prednisolone or aciclovir, used separately or in combination, early in the course of Bell's palsy, improves the chances of recovery at 3 and 9 months. DESIGN: A 2 x 2 factorial randomised double-blind trial. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment by an automated telephone service using a permuted block randomisation technique with block sizes of four or eight, and no stratification. SETTING: Mainland Scotland, with referrals mainly from general practice to 17 hospital trial sites. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (aged 16 years or older) with unilateral facial nerve weakness of no identifiable cause presenting to primary care, the emergency department or NHS24 within 72 hours of symptom onset. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to receive active preparations or placebo for 10 days: (1) prednisolone (50 mg per day, 2 x 25-mg capsules) and aciclovir (2000 mg per day, 5 x 400-mg capsules); (2) prednisolone and placebo (lactose, indistinguishable); (3) aciclovir and placebo; and (4) placebo and placebo. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was recovery of facial function assessed by the House-Brackmann scale. Secondary outcomes included health status, pain, self-perceived appearance and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Final outcomes were available for 496 patients, balanced for gender; mean age 44 years; initial facial paralysis moderate to severe. One half of patients initiated treatment within 24 hours of onset of symptoms, one-third within 24-48 hours and the remainder within 48-72 hours. Of the completed patients, 357 had recovered by 3 months and 80 at 9 months, leaving 59 with a residual deficit. There were significant differences in complete recovery at 3 months between the prednisolone comparison groups (83.0% for prednisolone, 63.6% for no prednisolone, a difference of + 19.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): + 11.7% to + 27.1%, p < 0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) in order to achieve one additional complete recovery was 6 (95% CI: 4 to 9). There was no significant difference between the aciclovir comparison groups (71.2% for aciclovir and 75.7% for no aciclovir). Nine-month assessments of patients recovered were 94.4% for prednisolone compared with 81.6% for no prednisolone, a difference of + 12.8% (95% CI: + 7.2% to + 18.4%, p < 0.001); the NNT was 8 (95% CI: 6 to 14). Proportions recovered at 9 months were 85.4% for aciclovir and 90.8% for no aciclovir, a difference of -5.3%. There was no significant prednisolone-aciclovir interaction at 3 months or at 9 months. Outcome differences by individual treatment (the four-arm model) showed significant differences. At 3 months the recovery rate was 86.3% in the prednisolone treatment group, 79.7% in the aciclovir-prednisolone group, 64.7% in the placebo group and 62.5% in the aciclovir group. At 9 months the recovery rates were respectively 96.1%, 92.7%, 85.3% and 78.1%. The increase in recovery rate conferred by the addition of prednisolone (both for prednisolone over placebo and for aciclovir-prednisolone over aciclovir) is highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in secondary measures apart from Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) at 9 months in those treated with prednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided robust evidence to support the early use of oral prednisolone in Bell's palsy as an effective treatment which may be considered cost-effective. Treatment with aciclovir, either alone or with steroids, had no effect on outcome.
机译:目的:确定在贝尔麻痹的早期,口服泼尼松龙或阿昔洛韦单独使用还是联合使用,可提高3个月和9个月的恢复机会。设计:一项2 x 2阶乘随机双盲试验。通过自动电话服务使用排列的随机分组技术将患者随机分配到治疗组,分组大小为四个或八个,并且没有分层。地点:苏格兰大陆,主要从普通科转诊到17个医院试验地点。参与者:症状发作后72小时内,无明显原因的单侧面部神经无力的成​​年人(16岁或以上)出现在基层医疗,急诊科或NHS24。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受活性制剂或安慰剂治疗10天:(1)泼尼松龙(每天50 mg,2 x 25 mg胶囊)和阿昔洛韦(每天2000 mg,5 x 400 mg胶囊); (2)泼尼松龙和安慰剂(乳糖,难以区分); (3)阿昔洛韦和安慰剂; (4)安慰剂和安慰剂。观察指标:主要结果是通过House-Brackmann量表评估的面部功能恢复。次要结局包括健康状况,疼痛,自我感觉的外观和成本效益。结果:有496例患者获得了最终结果,性别均衡。平均年龄44岁;最初的面神经麻痹为中度至重度。一半的患者在症状发作后24小时内开始治疗,三分之一的患者在24-48小时内开始治疗,其余的患者在48-72小时内开始治疗。在完成的患者中,有357例在3个月时恢复,9个月时80例恢复,剩下59例残缺。泼尼松龙对照组之间在3个月时的完全恢复率有显着差异(泼尼松龙为83.0%,非泼尼松龙为63.6%,相差+ 19.4%; 95%置信区间(CI):+ 11.7%至+ 27.1%, p <0.001)。为了获得另一种完全恢复所需的治疗数量(NNT)为6(95%CI:4至9)。阿昔洛韦对照组之间没有显着差异(阿昔洛韦为71.2%,无阿昔洛韦为75.7%)。泼尼松龙恢复患者的9个月评估为94.4%,而泼尼松龙未恢复的评估为81.6%,相差+ 12.8%(95%CI:+ 7.2%至+ 18.4%,p <0.001); NNT为8(95%CI:6至14)。阿昔洛韦在9个月时恢复的比例为85.4%,无阿昔洛韦为90.8%,相差-5.3%。在3个月或9个月时,泼尼松龙与阿昔洛韦之间无显着相互作用。个体治疗的结果差异(四臂模型)显示出显着差异。泼尼松龙治疗组在3个月时的恢复率为86.3%,阿昔洛韦-泼尼松龙组为79.7%,安慰剂组为64.7%,阿昔洛韦组为62.5%。在9个月时,恢复率分别为96.1%,92.7%,85.3%和78.1%。通过添加泼尼松龙(泼尼松龙优于安慰剂和阿昔洛韦-泼尼松龙高于阿昔洛韦)所带来的恢复率的提高具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。在泼尼松龙治疗的患者中,除了9个月的健康公用事业指数3(HUI3)以外,次要措施没有显着差异。结论:这项研究提供了有力的证据来支持在贝尔氏麻痹中早期使用口服泼尼松龙作为一种有效的治疗方法,可能被认为具有成本效益。单独使用阿昔洛韦或使用类固醇治疗对结局均无影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号