首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >A systematic review of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of precancerous skin conditions, Barrett's oesophagus and cancers of the biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophagus and skin
【24h】

A systematic review of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of precancerous skin conditions, Barrett's oesophagus and cancers of the biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophagus and skin

机译:对光动力疗法治疗癌前皮肤病,巴雷特食管和胆道,脑,头,颈,肺,食道和皮肤癌的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the use of a light-sensitive drug, in combination with light of a visible wavelength, to destroy target cells. PDT is used either as a primary treatment or as an adjunctive treatment. It is fairly well accepted in clinical practice for some types of skin cancer but has yet to be fully explored as a treatment for other forms of cancer. Objective: To systematically review the clinical effectiveness and safety of PDT in the treatment of Barrett's oesophagus, pre-cancerous skin conditions and the following cancers: biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophageal and skin. Data sources: The search strategy included searching electronic databases (between August and October 2008), followed by update searches in May 2009, along with relevant bibliographies, existing reviews, conference abstracts and contact with experts in the field. Study designs: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in skin conditions and Barrett's oesophagus, non-randomized trials for all other sites. Participants: People with Barrett's oesophagus, precancerous skin conditions or primary cancer in the following sites: biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophageal and skin. Intervention: Any type of PDT for either curative or palliative treatment. Comparators: Any comparator including differing applications of PDT treatments (relevant comparators varied according to the condition). Main outcomes: The outcomes measured were mortality, morbidity, quality of life, adverse events and resource use. Review methods: A standardised data extraction form was used. The quality of RCTs and non-randomised controlled studies was assessed using standard checklists. Data extracted from the studies were tabulated and discussed in a narrative synthesis, and the influence of study quality on results was discussed. Meta-analysis was used to estimate a summary measure of effect on relevant outcomes, with assessment of both clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts, and data extracted and quality assessed the trials, with discrepancies resolved by discussion or referral to a third reviewer. A scoping review was also undertaken. Results: Overall, 88 trials reported in 141 publications were included, with some trials covering more than one condition. For actinic keratosis (AK), the only clear evidence of effectiveness was that PDT appeared to be superior to placebo. For Bowen's disease, better outcomes with PDT were suggested when compared with cryotherapy or fluorouracil. For basal cell carcinoma (BCC), PDT may result in similar lesion response rates to surgery or cryotherapy but with better cosmetic outcomes. For nodular lesions, PDT appeared to be superior to placebo and less effective than surgery but suggestive of better cosmetic outcome. For Barrett's oesophagus, PDT in addition to omeprazole appeared to be more effective than omeprazole alone at long-term ablation of high-grade dysplasia and slowing/preventing progression to cancer. No firm conclusions could be drawn for PDT in oesophageal cancer. Further research into the role of PDT in lung cancer is needed. For cholangiocarcinoma, PDT may improve survival when compared with stenting alone. There was limited evidence on PDT for brain cancer and cancers of the head and neck. A wide variety of photosensitisers were used and, overall, no serious adverse effects were linked to PDT. Limitations: There were few well-conducted, adequately powered RCTs, and quality of life (QoL) and resource outcomes were under-reported. Problems were identified with reporting of key study features and quality parameters, making the reliability of some studies uncertain. Methodological limitations and gaps in the evidence base made it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Conclusions: Evidence of effectiveness was found for PDT in the treatment of AK and nodular BCC in relation to placebo, and possibly for treating Barrett's oesophagus
机译:背景:光动力疗法(PDT)是将光敏药物与可见波长的光结合使用来破坏靶细胞。 PDT被用作主要治疗方法或辅助治疗方法。对于某些类型的皮肤癌,它在临床实践中已被广泛接受,但是,尚未将其作为治疗其他形式癌症的方法得到充分研究。目的:系统评价PDT在治疗Barrett食管,癌前皮肤状况和以下癌症(胆道癌,脑癌,头颈癌,肺癌,食道癌和皮肤癌)中的临床有效性和安全性。数据来源:搜索策略包括搜索电子数据库(在2008年8月至2008年10月之间),然后在2009年5月进行更新搜索,以及相关的参考书目,现有评论,会议摘要以及与该领域专家的联系。研究设计:皮肤状况和Barrett食管的随机对照试验(RCT),其他所有部位的非随机试验。参与者:巴雷特食管,癌前皮肤状况或以下部位的原发癌患者:胆道,脑,头和颈,肺,食道和皮肤。干预:用于治疗或姑息治疗的任何类型的PDT。比较器:包括PDT处理的不同应用程序的任何比较器(相关的比较器根据情况而变化)。主要结果:测量的结果是死亡率,发病率,生活质量,不良事件和资源利用。审查方法:使用标准化的数据提取表。使用标准清单评估RCT和非随机对照研究的质量。将从研究中提取的数据制成表格并进行叙述性综合讨论,并讨论研究质量对结果的影响。荟萃分析用于评估对相关结局影响的汇总指标,并评估临床和统计异质性。两名审稿人独立筛选了所有标题和摘要,提取了数据并评估了质量,并通过讨论解决了差异或转介给第三名审稿人。还进行了范围界定审查。结果:总的来说,包括141种出版物中报道的88项试验,其中一些试验涵盖了不止一种疾病。对于光化性角化病(AK),唯一有效的明确证据是PDT似乎优于安慰剂。对于鲍恩氏病,与冷冻疗法或氟尿嘧啶相比,PDT的预后较好。对于基底细胞癌(BCC),PDT可能导致与手术或冷冻疗法相似的病变反应率,但美容效果更好。对于结节性病变,PDT似乎优于安慰剂,效果不如手术,但提示美容效果更好。对于巴雷特的食道,在长期消融高度不典型增生和减缓/预防癌症进展方面,除奥美拉唑外,PDT比奥美拉唑更有效。对于食管癌中的PDT尚无确切结论。需要进一步研究PDT在肺癌中的作用。对于胆管癌,与单独置入支架相比,PDT可以提高生存率。关于PDT的脑癌和头颈癌的证据有限。使用了多种光敏剂,总体而言,没有严重的不良反应与PDT相关。局限性:进行良好,功能完善的随机对照试验很少,生活质量(QoL)和资源成果的报告不足。报告关键研究特征和质量参数后发现问题,从而使某些研究的可靠性不确定。由于方法学上的局限性和证据基础的不足,很难得出明确的结论。结论:PDT在与安慰剂有关的AK和结节性BCC治疗中可能被证明有效,并可能在治疗Barrett食道方面有效

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号