...
【24h】

Involvement in mental health self-help groups and recovery

机译:参与心理健康自助小组和康复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Self-help groups for mental health problems are widely used, yet studies of their effectiveness show mixed results and are often not theoretically guided. Drawing on empowerment, stigma, and social selection perspectives, we test a theoretically organized model of the relationships between self-help group involvement, empowerment, and recovery outcomes (symptoms and quality of life). Using two-wave survey data from a sample of 553 persons with mental illnesses in self-help groups and outpatient services, we find (1) social selection' effects - persons with greater symptoms and lower quality of life are less likely to be a part of self-help groups, (2) that self-help is associated with some beneficial effects on self-esteem, but is associated with stronger beliefs about expected stigma, (3) that self-help may yield only slight benefits to quality of life, and (4) perceived helpfulness of self-help and group involvement are reciprocally related. Open-ended questions reveal why some of our respondents never attended self-help group meetings, why those who continue to attend do so, and why others stop attending.
机译:精神卫生问题自助小组得到了广泛使用,但对其有效性的研究却显示出不同的结果,而且通常在理论上没有指导。利用赋权,污名和社会选择的观点,我们测试了自助小组参与,赋权和恢复结果(症状和生活质量)之间关系的理论组织模型。使用自助小组和门诊患者中553名精神疾病患者的样本进行的两波调查数据,我们发现(1)社会选择的影响-症状较大且生活质量较低的人不太可能参与其中自助团体中,(2)自助与对自尊的一些有益影响有关,但与对预期污名的更坚强信念相关联,(3)自助对生活质量可能只会产生很小的好处,以及(4)自助和团队参与的感知帮助相互相关。不限成员名额的问题揭示了为什么我们的一些受访者从未参加自助小组会议,为什么那些继续参加自助小组会议,以及为什么其他人停止参加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号