首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Comparison of computed tomography imaging with intraprocedural contrast esophagram: implications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Comparison of computed tomography imaging with intraprocedural contrast esophagram: implications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

机译:计算机断层扫描成像与术中对比食管造影术的比较:对房颤导管消融的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has been used to localize the esophagus before radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare esophageal imaging by CT versus esophagram. METHODS: CT imaging of the left atrium was performed in 57 patients 1 week before RFA and was imported into the CARTO mapping system. The electrophysiologist created a virtual shell of the left atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) that was merged with the CT image; however, the CT-defined location of the esophagus was not displayed. The patient was then given 10 mL of oral contrast. Using fluoroscopy, an electroanatomic catheter tagged the esophageal borders outlined by esophagram. The CT-defined esophagus was then imported, and the borders were tagged on the merged map. In this manner, the esophagus borders by esophagram versus those by CT were compared. RESULTS: The maximum diameter of the esophagus by esophagram versus CT was not different (16.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 16.5 +/- 3.1 mm; P = .7). The esophagus was near the left PVs in 34 (62%), center in 13 (24%), and near the right PVs in eight (15%) patients. There was concordance between CT and esophagram in 48 of 55 patients (87%; P = .2). Ye, in 21 (44%) of 48 patients with concordant location, the CT-defined esophageal borders were separated from the esophagram-defined borders by >or=50% of the esophagus diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on remotely acquired CT images does not ensure adequate intraprocedural localization of the esophagus or enhance recognition of esophageal motility.
机译:背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)已被用于在房颤(AF)的射频消融(RFA)之前定位食管。目的:本研究的目的是比较CT与食管造影的食管成像。方法:RFA前1周对57例左心房进行CT成像,并将其导入CARTO测绘系统。电生理学家创建了一个左心房和肺静脉(PVs)的虚拟外壳,并将其与CT图像合并;但是,没有显示CT定义的食道位置。然后给患者10 mL口服对比剂。使用荧光透视法,一个电解剖导管标记了食管图勾勒出的食道边界。然后导入CT定义的食道,并在合并的地图上标记边框。以这种方式,比较了通过食管图和通过CT检查的食道边界。结果:食管图与CT对比,食管的最大直径没有差异(16.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 16.5 +/- 3.1 mm; P = 0.7)。食管位于左侧PVs附近的有34例(62%),位于中心的13例(24%)中,有8例(15%)的患者是在右侧PVs附近。 55例患者中有48例的CT与食管图一致(87%; P = 0.2)。是的,在48例位置一致的患者中,有21例(44%)中,CT定义的食管边界与食管图定义的边界相差大于或等于食管直径的50%。结论:依赖远程获取的CT图像不能确保食道在术中的充分定位或增强对食道运动性的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号