...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Response of right ventricular size to treatment with cardiac resynchronization therapy and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in MADIT-CRT
【24h】

Response of right ventricular size to treatment with cardiac resynchronization therapy and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in MADIT-CRT

机译:MADIT-CRT对右心室大小对心脏再同步治疗的反应以及室性快速性心律失常的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is increasingly recognized for its ability to reduce ventricular tachyarrhythmias, possibly associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling, but the role of the right ventricle (RV) in this process has not been examined. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between ventricular tachyarrhythmias and change in RV dimensions in patients receiving CRT with a defibrillator (CRT-D). Methods Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess the risk for fast (≥180 bpm) ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) or death by baseline and follow-up RV size (defined as right ventricular end-diastolic area [RVEDA]) among 1495 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Results Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with CRT-D was independently associated with a 27% (P =.003) reduction in the risk of VT/VF or death among patients with larger RVs (first quartile RVEDA ≥13 mm2/m2) compared with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-only therapy, whereas in patients with smaller RVs there was no significant difference in the risk of VT/VF between the 2 treatment arms (hazard ratio = 1.00, P =.99). At 1-year follow-up, CRT-D patients displayed significantly greater reductions in RVEDA compared to ICD-only patients (P .001), associated with a corresponding reduction in the risk of subsequent VT/VF or death (first quartile reduction in RVEDA with CRT-D vs ICD-only: hazard ratio = 0.55, P .001) independent of changes in left ventricular dimensions. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the RV may have an important role in determining the antiarrhythmic effect of CRT independent of the effect of the device on the left ventricle.
机译:背景技术心脏再同步治疗(CRT)具有减轻室性快速性心律失常的能力,这种能力可能与左心室逆向重塑有关,但这一过程尚未得到证实。目的本研究的目的是探讨使用除颤器(CRT-D)接受CRT的患者室速性心律失常与RV尺寸变化之间的关系。方法采用多元Cox比例风险回归模型,通过基线和随访RV大小(定义为右心室舒张末期[[定义为右心室舒张末期[[]]],评估快速(≥180bpm)室性心动过速/室颤(VT / VF)或死亡的风险。 1495名患者参加了心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)的多中心自动除颤器植入试验。结果多因素分析表明,与较大的RVs(>第一个四分位RVEDA≥13mm2 / m2)相比,CRT-D治疗与使VT / VF或死亡风险降低27%(P = .003)独立相关仅使用植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)进行治疗,而在RV较小的患者中,两个治疗组之间的VT / VF风险无显着差异(危险比= 1.00,P = .99)。在1年的随访中,与仅ICD的患者相比,CRT-D患者的RVEDA降低显着更大(P <.001),并相应降低了随后的VT / VF或死亡的风险(>第一个四分位数) CRT-D与仅ICD相比RVEDA降低:危险比= 0.55,P <.001),与左心室尺寸变化无关。结论我们的发现表明RV可能在确定CRT的抗心律不齐作用中起重要作用,而与装置对左心室的作用无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号