首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Celivarone in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Adjunctive therapy for the reduction of ventricular arrhythmia-triggered implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions
【24h】

Celivarone in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Adjunctive therapy for the reduction of ventricular arrhythmia-triggered implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions

机译:植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中的西维酮:减少心律失常触发的植入式心脏复律除颤器干预的辅助治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remain the treatment of choice for the prevention of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, many patients with ICDs require additional antiarrhythmic therapy to reduce the morbidity associated with recurrent arrhythmia-triggered ICD interventions. Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of celivarone in reducing these interventions. Methods: A total of 153 eligible ICD recipients were randomized to receive either placebo or celivarone 100 or 300 mg once daily for 6 months. The primary end point was the prevention of arrhythmia-triggered ICD therapies. Results: Fewer ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation episodes were observed in the 300-mg celivarone group than in the placebo group, with a relative risk reduction of 46%, which was not statistically significant. The analysis of all-cause shocks showed a trend toward a decreased number of events in the celivarone 300-mg group. A post hoc analysis of the primary end point in a subgroup of patients in the celivarone 300-mg group, who had received ICD therapy within 1 month of randomization, showed a significant benefit (P =.032). Celivarone was not associated with an increased risk of torsades de pointes, thyroid dysfunction, or pulmonary events. More heart failure events were reported in the celivarone groups than in the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Celivarone tends to reduce ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillationtriggered ICD therapies. This effect was not statistically significant. There was a trend toward greater efficacy in the 300-mg group, especially in patients undergoing ICD therapy within 30 days prior to randomization. Overall, celivarone was well tolerated.
机译:背景:植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)仍然是预防危及生命的心律不齐的首选治疗方法。但是,许多患有ICD的患者需要额外的抗心律不齐治疗,以减少因反复性心律不齐触发的ICD干预而引起的发病率。目的:我们的研究旨在评估西维酮在减少这些干预措施中的安全性和有效性。方法:总共153名合格的ICD接受者被随机分配,分别接受安慰剂或celivarone 100或300 mg每天一次,共6个月。主要终点是预防心律不齐触发的ICD治疗。结果:与安慰剂组相比,在300 mg的西维酮治疗组中观察到的室速和室颤事件较少,相对危险度降低了46%,但无统计学意义。对所有原因的电击的分析显示,西维酮300毫克组的事件数量减少趋势。对随机分组的1个月内接受ICD治疗的celivarone 300 mg组患者亚组的主要终点进行事后分析,显示出显着的获益(P = .032)。 Celivarone与尖锐湿疣,甲状腺功能障碍或肺部事件的风险增加无关。塞维酮组的心力衰竭事件多于安慰剂组,但差异无统计学意义。结论:Celivarone倾向于减少触发ICD治疗的室性心动过速/心室纤颤。该效果在统计学上不显着。 300毫克治疗组有提高疗效的趋势,尤其是在随机分组前30天内接受ICD治疗的患者。总体而言,塞维酮的耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号