...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Should industry share a greater burden for the cost of device recalls?
【24h】

Should industry share a greater burden for the cost of device recalls?

机译:工业界应该为设备召回费用承担更大的负担吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Burke et al,1 in this issue of the Journal, estimated that the cost to Medicare related to the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead failures is in the range of dollar167,000,000 to dollar806,000,000. Although critics may dispute the methods used in these calculations, the assumptions are reasonable, and whatever the true cost may be, it is substantial. In a larger context, the cost to Medicare related to treatment of patients with medical devices that fail or cause less catastrophic problems is a huge number. A recent analysis of medical device recalls identified 113 recalls from 2005 through 2009 that could cause serious health problems or death, and cardiovascular devices comprised the largest recall category.2 In 2005, approximately 24,000 patients underwent procedures related to other problems with Medtronic or Guidant devices.3 Although the companies provided replacements and compensated patients for up to dollar2,500 in out-of-pocket expenses, the remaining cost to Medicare and private insurers was not shared by industry. By one estimate, the cost to Medicare related to those replacement procedures was about dollar120 million.
机译:Burke等[1]在本期《华尔街日报》上估计,与Medtronic Sprint Fidelis铅失效有关的Medicare损失在167,000,000美元至806,000,000美元之间。尽管批评者可能会对这些计算中使用的方法提出异议,但这些假设是合理的,无论实际成本是多少,它都是巨大的。在更大的范围内,与使用故障或引起较少灾难性问题的医疗设备治疗患者有关的医疗保险费用是巨大的。最近对医疗设备召回进行的分析确定了从2005年到2009年的113次可能导致严重健康问题或死亡的召回,其中心血管设备是最大的召回类别。22005年,约有24,000名患者接受了与Medtronic或Guidant器械其他问题相关的手术.3尽管这些公司提供了补给品并向患者提供了最多2,500美元的自付费用,但医疗保险和私人保险公司的剩余费用并未由行业分担。据一项估计,与这些更换程序相关的医疗保险费用约为1.2亿美元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号