首页> 外文期刊>Health economics >Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters.
【24h】

Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters.

机译:当病人的信息很重要时,把关与直接访问。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We develop a principal-agent model in which the health authority acts as a principal for both a patient and a general practitioner (GP). The goal of the paper is to weigh the merits of gatekeeping versus non-gatekeeping approaches to health care when patient self-health information and patient pressure on GPs to provide referrals for specialized care are considered. We find that, when GPs incentives matter, a non-gatekeeping system is preferable only when (i) patient pressure to refer is sufficiently high and (ii) the quality of the patient's self-health information is neither highly inaccurate (in which case the patient's self-referral will be very inefficient) nor highly accurate (in which case the GP's agency problem will be very costly).
机译:我们开发了一种委托代理模型,在该模型中,卫生主管部门同时充当患者和全科医生(GP)的委托人。本文的目标是在考虑患者的自我健康信息和全科医生提供专门护理转诊的压力时,权衡采用门卫与非门卫治疗的优点。我们发现,当全科医生的激励措施很重要时,仅当(i)要推荐的患者压力足够高并且(ii)患者的自我健康信息的质量也不是很不准确时(在这种情况下,患者的自我推荐将非常低效)或非常不准确(在这种情况下,GP的代理问题将非常昂贵)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号