首页> 外文期刊>Health education research >Identifying cluster subtypes for intentions to have colorectal cancer screening among non-compliant intermediate-risk siblings of individuals with colorectal cancer.
【24h】

Identifying cluster subtypes for intentions to have colorectal cancer screening among non-compliant intermediate-risk siblings of individuals with colorectal cancer.

机译:在有结肠直肠癌的个体的非顺应性中度风险同胞中识别出打算进行结肠直肠癌筛查的簇亚型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients diagnosed at an early age are at increased risk for CRC, their compliance with colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is not high. Relatively little is known about why these intermediate-risk family members do not comply with CRCS. Study aims were to identify subgroups of siblings of individuals diagnosed with CRC prior to age 61 who were not compliant with CRCS using cluster analysis and to identify demographical, medical and attitudinal correlates of cluster membership. A total of 421 siblings completed measures of pros, cons, processes of change, CRCS knowledge, physician and family CRCS support, CRC risk, severity, preventability, curability, closeness with the affected sibling, distress about the sibling's cancer and screening intentions. Three clusters characterized as 'Positive about Screening', 'Uncertain about Screening' and 'Negative about Screening' were identified. External validation revealed that those in the Positive about Screening cluster reported significantly stronger CRCS intentions than those who are Uncertain about Screening and Negative about Screening clusters. Results provide an empirical typology for understanding motivations for CRCS among at-risk family members and may lead to the development of more effective interventions to improve screening uptake.
机译:尽管早期诊断为结直肠癌(CRC)的一级亲属患CRC的风险增加,但他们对结直肠癌筛查(CRCS)的依从性并不高。对于这些中等风险家庭成员为何不遵守CRCS的了解相对较少。研究的目的是使用聚类分析来确定在61岁之前被诊断患有CRC且不符合CRCS的个体的同胞亚组,并确定聚类成员的人口统计学,医学和态度相关性。共有421个兄弟姐妹完成了对利弊,变化过程,CRCS知识,医生和家庭CRCS支持,CRC风险,严重性,可预防性,可治愈性,与受影响兄弟姐妹的亲密关系,对兄弟姐妹癌症的困扰和筛查意图的测量。确定了三个集群,分别为“对筛查阳性”,“对筛查不确定”和“对筛查阴性”。外部验证显示,与“筛查不确定”和“筛查不确定”相比,“筛查阳性”组的CRCS意图要强得多。结果为了解高危家庭成员对CRCS的动机提供了经验类型,并可能导致开发出更有效的干预措施以提高筛查摄取率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号