首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Burden of migraine in Brazil: estimate of cost of migraine to the public health system and an analytical study of the cost-effectiveness of a stratified model of care.
【24h】

Burden of migraine in Brazil: estimate of cost of migraine to the public health system and an analytical study of the cost-effectiveness of a stratified model of care.

机译:巴西偏头痛的负担:偏头痛对公共卫生系统的成本估算以及对分层护理模式成本效益的分析研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The search for rationality in health expenses in developing countries collides with the lack of effectively conducted epidemiologic studies. PURPOSE: To present an estimate of the impact and costs of migraine in the Brazilian public health system and to estimate the impact on these costs and the effectiveness of a model of stratified care in the management of migraine. METHODS: An analytical model of utilization of the Brazilian public health system was constructed. Data refer to 1999 and were obtained in accordance with the following steps: (1) Brazilian demographic characteristics; (2) characteristics of the public health system related to its 3 hierarchical levels-primary, secondary, and tertiary care, the last being subdivided into emergency department and hospital care; and (3) estimation of the number of migraine consultations at each complexity level. In Brazil, migraineurs seen in the public health system are most often discharged with an acute treatment, usually a nonspecific medication. We compared this treatment with a proposed stratified care model that uses a triptan as an acute care medication. We have made the following assumptions: (1) 15% of the patients would fall into the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) grade I category, 25% would fall into the MIDAS grade II category, 30% into the grade III category, and 30% into the MIDAS grade IV category; (2) the mean number of migraine attacks per year are: MIDAS I, 7.49; MIDAS II, 8.02; MIDAS III, 12.22; and MIDAS IV, 27.01. The annual costs of the treatment were calculated according to the following equation: AC = P x N x C + P x Cp + P x Cat x AMA, where P is the number of patients; N, the number of consultations per patient; C, the cost of consultation per level; Cp, the cost of preventive drugs; Cat, the cost of acute therapy drugs; and AMA is the number of migraine attacks per year. Results.-The public health system resources included 55 735 ambulatory units (primary and secondary) and 6453 emergency department and public hospital units, with a corresponding budget of US
机译:背景:在发展中国家寻求合理的医疗费用与缺乏有效进行的流行病学研究相冲突。目的:介绍偏头痛对巴西公共卫生系统的影响和费用的估计,并估计对这些费用的影响以及分层治疗模式在偏头痛管理中的有效性。方法:建立了利用巴西公共卫生系统的分析模型。数据涉及1999年,是根据以下步骤获得的:(1)巴西人口特征; (2)公共卫生系统的特征涉及其三级级别:初级,二级和三级医疗,最后一个细分为急诊科和医院护理; (3)估算每个复杂程度的偏头痛咨询次数。在巴西,在公共卫生系统中看到的偏头痛患者通常最先接受急性治疗,通常是非特异性药物。我们将这种治疗方法与拟议的分层治疗模型进行了比较,该模型采用曲坦作为急性治疗药物。我们做出以下假设:(1)15%的患者将属于I级偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS),25%的患者将属于MIDAS II级,30%的患者属于III级,30% %属于MIDAS IV级类别; (2)每年偏头痛发作的平均次数为:MIDAS I,7.49; MIDAS II,8.02; MIDAS III,12.22;和MIDAS IV,27.01。根据以下公式计算每年的治疗费用:AC = P x N x C + P x Cp + P x Cat x AMA,其中P是患者人数; N,每位患者的咨询次数; C,每级咨询费用; Cp,预防药物的成本;猫,急性治疗药物的费用; AMA是每年偏头痛发作的次数。结果。-公共卫生系统资源包括55 735个门诊部门(主要和次要部门)和6453个急诊科和公立医院部门,相应的预算为美国

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号