...
首页> 外文期刊>Headache >HIT-6 and MIDAS as Measures of Headache Disability in a Headache Referral Population
【24h】

HIT-6 and MIDAS as Measures of Headache Disability in a Headache Referral Population

机译:HIT-6和MIDAS作为头痛转诊人群中头痛残疾的衡量指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective.-The objective of this study was to compare the headache impact test (HIT-6) and the migraine disability assessment scale (MIDAS) as clinical measures of headache-related disability.Background.-The degree of headache-related disability is an important factor in treatment planning. Many quality of life and headache disability measures exist but it is unclear which of the available disability measures is the most helpful in planning and measuring headache management.Methods.-We compared HIT-6 and MIDAS scores from 798 patients from the Canadian Headache Outpatient Registry and Database (CHORD). Correlation and regression analyses were used to examine the relationships between the HIT-6 and MIDAS total scores, headache frequency and intensity, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) scores.Results.-A positive correlation was found between HIT-6 and MIDAS scores (r = 0.52). The BDI-II scores correlated equally with the HIT-6 and the MIDAS (r = 0.42). There was a non-monotonic relationship between headache frequency and the MIDAS, and a non-linear monotonic relationship between headache frequency and the HIT-6 (r = 0.24). The correlation was higher between the intensity and the HIT-6 scores (r = 0.46), than MIDAS (r = 0.26) scores. Seventy-nine percent of patients fell into the most severe HIT-6 disability category, compared with the 57% of patients that fell into the most severe MIDAS disability category. Significantly more patients were placed in a more severe category with the HIT-6 than with the MIDAS (McNemar chi-square = 191 on 6 d.f., P < .0001).Conclusions.-The HIT-6 and MIDAS appear to measure headache-related disability in a similar fashion. However, some important differences may exist. Headache intensity appears to influence HIT-6 score more than the MIDAS, whereas the MIDAS was influenced more by headache frequency. Using the HIT-6 and MIDAS together may give a more accurate assessment of a patient's headache-related disability.
机译:目的。-本研究的目的是比较头痛影响测试(HIT-6)和偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)作为头痛相关残疾的临床指标。-背景-头痛相关残疾的程度是一项治疗计划中的重要因素。生活质量和头痛残疾的测量方法很多,但尚不清楚哪种可用的残疾测量方法最有助于计划和衡量头痛的治疗方法。-我们比较了加拿大头痛门诊登记处798例患者的HIT-6和MIDAS评分和数据库(CHORD)。相关性和回归分析用于检验HIT-6与MIDAS总分,头痛频率和强度以及贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)得分之间的关​​系。--HIT-6与MIDAS正相关得分(r = 0.52)。 BDI-II得分与HIT-6和MIDAS均等相关(r = 0.42)。头痛频率与MIDAS之间呈非单调关系,头痛频率与HIT-6之间呈非线性单调关系(r = 0.24)。强度和HIT-6分数(r = 0.46)之间的相关性高于MIDAS(r = 0.26)分数。 79%的患者属于最严重的HIT-6残疾类别,而57%的患者属于最严重的MIDAS残疾类别。使用HIT-6的患者比使用MIDAS的患者严重得多(McNemar卡方= 191在6 df时,P <.0001)。结论-HIT-6和MIDAS似乎可以测量头痛-相关残疾。但是,可能存在一些重要差异。头痛强度似乎比MIDAS对HIT-6评分的影响更大,而MIDAS受头痛频率的影响更大。一起使用HIT-6和MIDAS可以更准确地评估患者的头痛相关残疾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号