...
首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Spinal manipulations for cervicogenic headaches: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.
【24h】

Spinal manipulations for cervicogenic headaches: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

机译:颈椎手术治疗颈源性头痛:对随机临床试验的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of spinal manipulations as a treatment option for cervicogenic headaches. Seven databases were searched from their inception to February 2011. All randomized trials which investigated spinal manipulations performed by any type of healthcare professional for treating cervicogenic headaches in human subjects were considered. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validation were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Nine randomized clinical trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Their methodological quality was mostly poor. Six RCTs suggested that spinal manipulation is more effective than physical therapy, gentle massage, drug therapy, or no intervention. Three RCTs showed no differences in pain, duration, and frequency of headaches compared to placebo, manipulation, physical therapy, massage, or wait list controls. Adequate control for placebo effect was achieved in 1 RCT only, and this trial showed no benefit of spinal manipulations beyond a placebo effect. The majority of RCTs failed to provide details of adverse effects. There are few rigorous RCTs testing the effectiveness of spinal manipulations for treating cervicogenic headaches. The results are mixed and the only trial accounting for placebo effects fails to be positive. Therefore, the therapeutic value of this approach remains uncertain.
机译:该系统评价的目的是评估脊柱操纵作为治疗宫颈源性头痛的有效方法。从开始到2011年2月,共检索了七个数据库。考虑了所有随机试验,该试验研究了任何类型的医疗专业人员在治疗人类受试者中引起宫颈源性头痛时所进行的脊柱操纵。研究的选择,数据提取和验证均由2位审阅者独立进行。九项随机临床试验(RCT)符合纳入标准。他们的方法学质量大多很差。六项RCT建议,脊柱操纵比物理疗法,轻柔按摩,药物疗法或不进行干预更有效。与安慰剂,操作,物理治疗,按摩或等待清单对照相比,三个RCT显示疼痛,持续时间和头痛发作频率无差异。仅在1个RCT中就实现了对安慰剂作用的充分控制,并且该试验显示脊柱操作没有超出安慰剂作用的益处。大多数RCT未能提供不利影响的详细信息。很少有严格的RCT可以测试脊柱处理对治疗宫颈源性头痛的有效性。结果好坏参半,唯一关于安慰剂作用的试验未能肯定。因此,这种方法的治疗价值仍然不确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号