...
首页> 外文期刊>Health services & outcomes research methodology >The impact of survey design modifications on health insurance coverage estimates in a National Longitudinal Health Care Survey
【24h】

The impact of survey design modifications on health insurance coverage estimates in a National Longitudinal Health Care Survey

机译:全国纵向医疗保健调查中调查设计修改对健康保险覆盖率估计的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

National health insurance coverage estimates for the overall population and specific population subgroups are critical to policymakers and others concerned with access to medical care and the cost and sources of payment for that care. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is one of the core health care surveys in the United States that serves as a primary source for these essential national health insurance coverage estimates. The survey is designed to provide annual national estimates of the health care use, medical expenditures, sources of payment and insurance coverage for the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population. In 2007, the survey experienced two dominant survey design modifications: (1) a new sample design attributable to the sample redesign of the National Health Interview Survey, and (2) an upgrade to the CAPI platform for the survey instrument, moving from a DOS to a Windows based environment. This study examines the impact of these survey design modifications on the national estimates of insurance coverage. The overlapping panel design of the MEPS survey and its longitudinal features are particularly well suited to assess the impact of survey redesign modifications on estimates. Since two independent nationally representative samples are pooled to produce calendar year estimates, one has the capacity to compare estimates based on the "original survey design" in contrast to those derived from the "survey redesign." This paper examines the correlates of nonresponse incorporated in the estimation techniques and adjustment methods employed in the survey, and the measures utilized for post-stratification overall and by panel. Particular attention is given to assessing the level of convergence in coverage estimates based on the alternative designs as well as the alignment of model based analyses that discern which factors are associated with health insurance classifications. The paper concludes with a discussion of strategies under consideration that may yield additional improvements in the accuracy for these critical policy relevant survey estimates.
机译:对于总人口和特定人群亚组的国家健康保险覆盖率估计,对于决策者和其他与获得医疗服务以及该医疗的费用和支付来源有关的人士而言至关重要。医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)是美国的核心卫生保健调查之一,是这些基本国民健康保险覆盖率估算的主要来源。该调查旨在提供美国国民非医疗化居民的医疗保健使用,医疗支出,支付来源和保险范围的年度全国估计。在2007年,该调查经历了两项主要的调查设计修改:(1)可归因于国家卫生访问调查的样本重新设计的新样本设计,以及(2)从DOS升级到用于调查工具的CAPI平台到基于Windows的环境。本研究考察了这些调查设计修改对国家保险范围估计的影响。 MEPS调查的重叠面板设计及其纵向特征特别适合评估调查重新设计修改对估计的影响。由于汇集了两个独立的,具有国家代表性的样本,可以得出日历年的估算值,因此一个样本可以比较基于“原始调查设计”的估算,而不是根据“调查重新设计”得出的估算。本文研究了调查中所采用的估计技术和调整方法中所包含的无应答的相关性,以及整体和小组采用的用于分层后的措施。特别要注意的是,基于替代设计以及对基于模型的分析(确定哪些因素与健康保险分类相关)的评估,评估覆盖范围估计的趋同水平。本文最后讨论了正在考虑的策略,这些策略可能会为这些关键的与政策相关的调查估计值带来更多的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号