...
首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Marketed oral triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review on efficacy and tolerability.
【24h】

Marketed oral triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review on efficacy and tolerability.

机译:市售的口服曲坦类药物在偏头痛的急性治疗中:对疗效和耐受性的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: In the current literature, there is neither a reported systematic review comparing the efficacy of triptans at 30 minutes and 1 hour after the migraine treatment, nor data related to efficacy of new marketed triptans. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this analysis was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of currently marketed oral, non-reencapsulated triptan formulations vs placebo in the treatment of moderate-to-severe migraine attacks. METHODS: A systematic review of double-blind, randomized clinical trials reporting data after a single migraine attack was conducted. Efficacy results are shown using relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: After reviewing 221 publications, 38 studies were included. All marketed triptans provided significant relief and/or absence of pain at 2 hours, and relief at 1 hour when compared with placebo. After 30 minutes, fast-dissolving sumatriptan 50 and 100 mg, sumatriptan 50 mg, and rizatriptan 10 mg showed significant relief when compared to placebo, whereas the fast-dissolving formulation of sumatriptan 100 mg was the only oral triptan that was superior to placebo in meeting the pain-free endpoint. On the other hand, fast-dissolving sumatriptan 50 and 100 mg and eletriptan 40 mg showed a lower rate of recurrence than placebo, whereas rizatriptan 10 mg was the only triptan with a recurrence rate greater than that of placebo. Adverse events associated with treatment with tablet formulations of sumatriptan and zolmitriptan were significantly more frequent than those of the placebo group. The inclusion of trials with reencapsulated triptans in the analysis introduced minor specific changes in these results. CONCLUSION: This analysis updates the comparative data available for the 7 currently marketed oral triptans and clearly demonstrates their efficacy when compared to placebo, even with stricter endpoints, such as efficacy at 30 minutes. No triptan exhibited better tolerability than placebo. Results are diverse, depending on the triptan, which probably is a reflection of heterogeneous pharmacokinetics.
机译:背景:在目前的文献中,没有关于偏头痛治疗后30分钟和1小时比较曲普坦疗效的报道,也没有与新上市曲普坦功效相关的数据。目的:本分析的主要目的是比较目前市售的口服,未重新封装的曲普坦制剂与安慰剂相比,在中度至重度偏头痛发作中的疗效和耐受性。方法:对单次偏头痛发作后报告数据的双盲,随机临床试验进行了系统评价。使用具有95%置信区间的相对风险比率显示疗效结果。还进行了敏感性分析。结果:在审查了221种出版物后,纳入了38项研究。与安慰剂相比,所有市售的曲坦类药物都能在2小时内显着缓解和/或减轻疼痛,在1小时内缓解。 30分钟后,速溶舒马曲坦50和100 mg,舒马曲坦50 mg和利扎曲普坦10 mg与安慰剂相比显示出明显的缓解,而舒马曲坦100 mg的速溶制剂是唯一在安慰剂中优于安慰剂的口服曲坦达到无痛终点。另一方面,速溶舒马曲坦50和100 mg和依曲曲坦40 mg显示的复发率低于安慰剂,而利扎曲坦10 mg是唯一的曲普坦,其复发率高于安慰剂。舒马曲坦和佐米曲普坦片制剂治疗相关不良事件的发生频率明显高于安慰剂组。在分析中纳入了重新封装曲坦类药物的试验,这些结果均出现了细微的具体变化。结论:该分析更新了目前市售的7种口服曲坦类药物的比较数据,并清楚地证明了与安慰剂相比的功效,即使终点更为严格,例如30分钟时的功效。没有曲普坦比安慰剂表现出更好的耐受性。结果取决于曲普坦,这可能是不同的药代动力学的反映。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号