...
首页> 外文期刊>Head and neck: Journal for the sciences and specialities of the head and neck >Perspective of physicians within a multidisciplinary team: Content validation of the comprehensive ICF core set for head and neck cancer
【24h】

Perspective of physicians within a multidisciplinary team: Content validation of the comprehensive ICF core set for head and neck cancer

机译:多学科团队中医生的观点:头颈癌综合ICF核心集的内容验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background. The Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Head and Neck Cancer (ICF-HNC) is an application of the ICF and guides multidisciplinary cancer follow-up and rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective of this study was to understand the role of physicians within the multidisciplinary team and to explore the content validity of the ICF-HNC from the perspective of physicians. Methods. In a 3-round Delphi survey, physicians experienced in the treatment of head and neck cancer were asked what patients'problems, resources, and aspects of environment they treat. The responses of the first round were linked to the ICF. In the second round the participants received a list of identified ICF categories and were asked if these ICF categories represent patients' problems, resources, and aspects of the environment they treat. Round 3 required a reconsideration of the given answers in accord with the group response. The agreement of the linking process between 2 health care professionals was calculated using kappa statistics. Results. In all, 55 physicians from 25 countries gave 781 statements; 83 ICF categories were linked to the statements after the first round; 55 ICF categories reached consensus of ≥75% after the third round. Of these, 46 categories (84%) are already included in the ICF-HNC. Within the entire ICF-HNC, physicians treat most categories from body structures (88%) and functions (76%) and some categories from activities and participation (15%) and environmental factors (21%). The kappa coefficient for linking ICF categories was 0.988 (95% bootstrapped confidence interval: 0.95-0.99). Conclusions. The content validity of the ICF-HNC was supported by the perspective of physicians. This study supports the need for a multidisciplinary team. The aspects of functioning which are not treated by physicians should be addressed by timely involvement of other health professions.
机译:背景。 《国际头颈癌功能,残疾和健康核心综合分类》(ICF-HNC)是ICF的一项应用,可指导头颈癌患者的多学科癌症随访和康复。这项研究的目的是了解医师在多学科团队中的作用,并从医师的角度探讨ICF-HNC的内容有效性。方法。在为期3轮的Delphi调查中,向具有头颈癌治疗经验的医生询问了患者所治疗的问题,资源和环境方面。第一轮的回应与ICF相关。在第二轮中,参与者收到了已确定的ICF类别列表,并被询问这些ICF类别是否代表患者的问题,资源以及所治疗的环境方面。第三轮需要根据小组回答重新考虑给出的答案。使用kappa统计数据计算了2位医疗保健专业人员之间的链接过程协议。结果。来自25个国家的55位医师总共发表了781份声明;第一轮之后,有83个ICF类别与声明相关;第三轮之后,有55个ICF类别达成了≥75%的共识。其中,ICF-HNC已包含46个类别(占84%)。在整个ICF-HNC中,医生从身体结构(88%)和功能(76%)处理大多数类别,并从活动和参与(15%)和环境因素(21%)处理某些类别。连接ICF类别的卡伯系数为0.988(95%自举置信区间:0.95-0.99)。结论。 ICF-HNC的内容有效性得到了医生的支持。这项研究支持需要一个多学科团队。不能由医生治疗的功能方面应通过其他卫生专业人员的及时参与来解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号