首页> 外文期刊>WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics >Effect of the finite difference solution scheme in a free boundary convective mass transfer model
【24h】

Effect of the finite difference solution scheme in a free boundary convective mass transfer model

机译:有限差分解方案在自由边界对流传质模型中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Moving boundary mass transfer inside a cylindrical capillary tube was properly represented in a previous work [1], considering no convective effects for the liquid phase. The technique for solving the model was the methodology developed by Illingworth and Golosnoy [2], which transformed the moving boundaries in fixed ones. That model was not adequate to represent the mass transfer inside square capillaries, because convective flow patterns generated by tube corners were not considered. In this work, the convective term was considered in the liquid phase and in the interface equations. Discretisation in liquid phase and interface equations was modified due the inclusion of the new term. Two different solution schemes were used for the finite difference method, applied to the liquid phase. A semi-implicit model, where the terms in the coefficient matrix associated to the concentration (diffusion coefficient and convective term) were evaluated in the previous concentration value; in this way, the finite difference matrix has constant coefficients. A fully implicit model, with those terms evaluated at the present concentration value. In this case, the finite difference matrix has variable coefficients and an additional iterative calculation must be solved until there is no variation in concentration profiles. Results showed that simulation time (10 min), relative error (7.53%) and molar flux ratio (2.98) for semi-implicit model is bigger than the simulation time (6 min), relative error (4.54%) and molar flux ratio (2.2) for fully implicit model. It was concluded that finite difference solution scheme strongly affects the predicted molar flux ratio, but it is not very important for the interface displacement prediction.
机译:考虑到液相没有对流效应,在先前的工作[1]中适当地表示了在圆柱形毛细管内的移动边界传质。求解模型的技术是Illingworth和Golosnoy [2]开发的方法,该方法将移动边界转换为固定边界。该模型不足以表示方形毛细管内部的传质,因为未考虑由管角产生的对流流动模式。在这项工作中,在液相和界面方程中考虑了对流项。液相和界面方程的离散化由于包含了新项而被修改。将两种不同的解决方案用于有限差分法,并应用于液相。一个半隐式模型,其中系数矩阵中与浓度相关的项(扩散系数和对流项)在先前的浓度值中进行了评估;这样,有限差分矩阵具有恒定的系数。完全隐式模型,这些术语在当前浓度值下评估。在这种情况下,有限差分矩阵具有可变系数,必须解决附加的迭代计算,直到浓度曲线没有变化为止。结果表明,半隐式模型的仿真时间(10 min),相对误差(7.53%)和摩尔通量比(2.98)大于仿真时间(6 min),相对误差(4.54%)和摩尔通量比( 2.2)用于完全隐式模型。结论是有限差分解决方案对预测的摩尔通量比有很大的影响,但是对于界面位移的预测并不是很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号