...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:laser激光与标准经尿道前列腺切除术治疗前列腺良性梗阻:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for treating patients with benign prostatic obstruction. Methods A systematic search of the electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library, was performed up to February 1, 2014. The pooled estimates of demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, complications, and postoperative efficacy including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual (PVR) were calculated. Results Seven trials assessing thulium laser versus standard TURP were considered suitable for meta-analysis including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs.
机译:目的评估ul激光与标准经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)相比对前列腺良性梗阻患者的疗效和安全性。方法截至2014年2月1日,系统地搜索了包括Medline,Embase,Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆在内的电子数据库。汇总的人口统计学和临床​​基线特征,围手术期变量,并发症和术后疗效的估计值包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),生活质量(QoL),最大流率(Qmax)和空腹残余(PVR)。结果七项评估th激光与标准TURP的试验被认为适合进行荟萃分析,其中包括四项随机对照试验(RCT)和三项非RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号