...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Insertion of double J stent as a therapeutic test in management of adults presenting with loin pain and equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
【24h】

Insertion of double J stent as a therapeutic test in management of adults presenting with loin pain and equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

机译:插入双J支架作为治疗成人腰痛和模棱两可的输尿管盆腔阻塞的治疗方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate temporary double J ureteric stenting (TDJS) as a test to diagnose ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in equivocal cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nine consecutive adult patients with loin pain and ipsilateral equivocal UPJO (EqUPJO) on radioisotope diuretic renogram (RDR) were enrolled in the present study. All patients underwent TDJS for 3 weeks. According to the response (relief of pain) to TDJS, which was assessed by visual analogue pain score (VAPS), patient preference and further management, patients were classified into five groups: Group Ia non-responders who elected conservative treatment for their condition, Group Ib non-responders who elected intervention, Group IIa responders who elected conservative treatment and Group IIb responders who elected intervention. Last group patients were randomized to either early (Group IIb(1)) or delayed intervention 3 months later (Group IIb(2)). Intervention was in the form of pyeloplasty (24 patients) and endopyelotomy (38 patients). All patients were followed up by measuring VAPS and RDR. RESULTS: After at least 6 months from management decision, 97 patients were available for evaluation. The VAPS dropped by 21.25% (P < 0.001), 32% (P = 0.004), 2% (P = 0.6), 54% (P < 0.001) and 65% (P < 0.001) in groups Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb1, and IIb2, respectively. On the other hand the T (1/2) of RDR dropped significantly only in groups Ib, IIb1, and IIb2 by a mean of 6.5 min (P = 0.005), 8.02 min (P < 0.001), and 7.3 min (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: TDJS in cases of EqUPJO with loin pain is helpful in defining cases suitable for intervention versus conservative treatment.
机译:目的:评估暂时性双J输尿管支架置入术(TDJS)作为诊断模棱两可的病例的输尿管-盆腔连接阻塞(UPJO)的一项测试。材料与方法:本研究纳入了109例连续的腰痛和同侧模棱两可的UPJO(EqUPJO)的成人患者,根据放射性同位素利尿肾图(RDR)进行了研究。所有患者均接受TDJS治疗3周。根据通过视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAPS)评估的TDJS反应(缓解疼痛),患者喜好和进一步治疗,将患者分为五组:第Ia组无反应者,选择了适合其病情的保守治疗;选择干预的Ib组非响应者,选择保守治疗的IIa组响应者和选择干预的IIb组响应者。最后一组患者被随机分为早期(IIb(1)组)或3个月后延迟干预(IIb(2)组)。干预形式为肾盂成形术(24例)和肾盂切开术(38例)。所有患者均接受了VAPS和RDR​​的随访。结果:在做出管理决定至少6个月后,有97例患者可供评估。在Ia,Ib,IIa组中,VAPS下降了21.25%(P <0.001),32%(P = 0.004),2%(P = 0.6),54%(P <0.001)和65%(P <0.001) ,IIb1和IIb2。另一方面,RDR的T(1/2)仅在Ib,IIb1和IIb2组中显着下降,分别为6.5分钟(P = 0.005),8.02分钟(P <0.001)和7.3分钟(P < 0.001)。结论:TDJS治疗腰痛的EqUPJO病例有助于确定适合介入治疗还是保守治疗的病例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号