...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Prospective comparison of scar-related satisfaction and quality of life after laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: No differences from patients' point of view
【24h】

Prospective comparison of scar-related satisfaction and quality of life after laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: No differences from patients' point of view

机译:腹腔镜与开放式前列腺癌根治术后瘢痕相关满意度和生活质量的前瞻性比较:从患者的角度看无差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate and compare scar-related satisfaction in patients treated with open (ORP) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Patients and method: We prospectively included all patients treated with ORP and LRP in our department between March and June 2010. Scar-related outcomes were collected at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Three months after surgery, all patients filled up a questionnaire concerning their scar-related symptoms, scar self-consciousness and satisfaction. These variables were statistically compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 101 patients were included for analysis. Of them, 48, 49 and 4 were treated with LRP, ORP and LRP converted to ORP, respectively. Age distribution was not statistically different between groups. Postoperatively, 5 patients experienced skin infection on their scar site, 2 in the ORP and 3 in the LRP group. The most frequently reported symptom was scar itching, that was more frequent after LRP, although difference was not significant (33 vs. 19 %, p = 0. 2). According to patient scar-related consciousness, satisfaction and impact on quality of life, no differences were reported between groups. Impact on quality of life was insignificant in 27 (55 %) versus 21 (44 %) patients after ORP and LRP, respectively (p = 0. 3). Conclusion: With an overall low impact on satisfaction and quality of life, scars gendered by LRP and ORP were not different from patients' point of view. In patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the cosmetic aspect of scars does not seem to be a concern.
机译:目的:评价和比较开放(ORP)与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)治疗的患者瘢痕相关的满意度。患者和方法:我们前瞻性地纳入了2010年3月至2010年6月间在我科接受ORP和LRP治疗的所有患者。在手术后1和3个月收集与疤痕相关的结局。手术三个月后,所有患者填写了一份有关疤痕相关症状,疤痕自我意识和满意度的问卷。在两组之间对这些变量进行统计学比较。结果:共纳入101例患者进行分析。其中48、49和4分别用LRP,ORP和转化为ORP的LRP处理。两组之间的年龄分布没有统计学差异。术后有5例患者的疤痕部位皮肤感染,ORP组2例,LRP组3例。最常报告的症状是疤痕瘙痒,虽然差异不显着,但疤痕瘙痒在LRP后更为频繁(33%vs. 19%,p = 0。2)。根据患者疤痕相关的意识,满意度和对生活质量的影响,两组之间没有差异。在接受ORP和LRP后,分别对27名患者(55%)和21名患者(44%)对生活质量的影响微不足道(p = 0. 3)。结论:总体上对满意度和生活质量的影响较低,LRP和ORP所致的疤痕与患者的观点无异。在接受前列腺癌根治术的患者中,疤痕的美观方面似乎并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号