...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: Results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group
【24h】

Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: Results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group

机译:在十个国际活检队列中评估PCPT风险计算器:前列腺活检合作小组的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and net benefit performance of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) across five European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), 1 United Kingdom, 1 Austrian, and 3 US biopsy cohorts. Methods: PCPTRC risks were calculated for 25,733 biopsies using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, family history, history of prior biopsy, and imputation for missing covariates. Predictions were evaluated using the areas underneath the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), discrimination slopes, chi-square tests of goodness of fit, and net benefit decision curves. Results: AUCs of the PCPTRC ranged from a low of 56% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Rounds 2-6 cohort to a high of 72% in the ERSPC Goeteborg Round 1 cohort and were statistically significantly higher than that of PSA in 6 out of the 10 cohorts. The PCPTRC was well calibrated in the SABOR, Tyrol, and Durham cohorts. There was limited to no net benefit to using the PCPTRC for biopsy referral compared to biopsying all or no men in all five ERSPC cohorts and benefit within a limited range of risk thresholds in all other cohorts. Conclusions: External validation of the PCPTRC across ten cohorts revealed varying degree of success highly dependent on the cohort, most likely due to different criteria for and work-up before biopsy. Future validation studies of new calculators for prostate cancer should acknowledge the potential impact of the specific cohort studied when reporting successful versus failed validation.
机译:目标:在五个针对前列腺癌筛查的欧洲随机研究(ERSPC),1个英国,1个奥地利人和3个美国活检人群中,评估前列腺癌预防试验风险计算器(PCPTRC)的鉴别,校准和纯利性能。方法:使用前列腺特异抗原(PSA),直肠指检,家族史,既往活检史以及对协变量缺失的估算,计算了25733例活检的PCPTRC风险。使用接收者工作特征曲线(AUC),分辨力斜率,拟合优度的卡方检验和净收益决策曲线下面的区域来评估预测。结果:PCPTRC的AUC范围从ERSPC哥德堡第2-6轮研究队列的低56%到ERSPC哥德堡第1轮研究队列的72%的高,在统计学上显着高于PSA的10分之6队列。 PCPTRC在SABOR,Tyrol和Durham队列中进行了很好的校准。与对所有五个ERSPC队列中的所有男人或不对男人进行活检相比,使用PCPTRC进行活检转诊没有任何净收益,而在所有其他队列的风险阈值范围内,则没有收益。结论:十个队列的PCPTRC的外部验证显示,成功的程度不同,很大程度上取决于该队列,这很可能是由于活检之前的标准和检查工作不同。对于前列腺癌新计算器的未来验证研究应在报告成功或失败验证时承认所研究特定队列的潜在影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号