...
【24h】

A prospective evaluation of missed injuries in trauma patients, before and after formalising the trauma tertiary survey

机译:在正式进行创伤三级调查之前和之后,对创伤患者遗漏的伤害进行前瞻性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: This study prospectively evaluated in-hospital and postdischarge missed injury rates in admitted trauma patients, before and after the formalisation of a trauma tertiary survey (TTS) procedure. Methods: Prospective before-and-after cohort study. TTS were formalised in a single regional level II trauma hospital in November 2009. All multitrauma patients admitted between March-October 2009 (preformalisation of TTS) and December 2009-September 2010 (post-) were assessed for missed injury, classified into three types: Type I, in-hospital, (injury missed at initial assessment, detected within 24 h); Type II, in-hospital (detected in hospital after 24 h, missed at initial assessment and by TTS); Type III, postdischarge (detected after hospital discharge). Secondary outcome measures included TTS performance rates and functional outcomes at 1 and 6 months. Results: A total of 487 trauma patients were included (pre-: n = 235; post-: n = 252). In-hospital missed injury rate (Types I and II combined) was similar for both groups (3.8 vs. 4.8 %, P = 0.61), as were postdischarge missed injury rates (Type III) at 1 month (13.7 vs. 11.5 %, P = 0.43), and 6 months (3.8 vs. 3.3 %, P = 0.84) after discharge. TTS performance was substantially higher in the post-group (27 vs. 42 %, P < 0.001). Functional outcomes for both cohorts were similar at 1 and 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate missed injury rates after hospital discharge and demonstrated cumulative missed injury rates >15 %. Some of these injuries were clinically relevant. Although TTS performance was significantly improved by formalising the process (from 27 to 42 %), this did not decrease missed injury rates.
机译:目的:本研究前瞻性评估了创伤三级调查(TTS)程序正规化之前和之后入院的创伤患者的院内和出院后漏诊伤害率。方法:前瞻性队列研究前后。 TTS于2009年11月在一家二级二级创伤医院中正式化。对2009年3月至10月(TTS的形式化)至2009年12月至2010年9月(后)的所有多发伤患者进行了遗漏评估,分为以下三种类型: I型,医院内(在最初评估中遗漏的伤害,在24小时内发现); II型,院内(24小时后在医院发现,在初次评估时和TTS漏诊); III型,出院后(出院后发现)。次要结局指标包括1和6个月时的TTS表现率和功能结局。结果:总共包括487名创伤患者(前:n = 235;后:n = 252)。两组的院内漏诊伤害率(I和II型合并)相似(3.8%vs. 4.8%,P = 0.61),以及出院后1个月的漏诊漏诊率(III型)(13.7%vs. 11.5%, P = 0.43),以及出院后6个月(3.8对3.3%,P = 0.84)。后期组的TTS表现明显更高(27%vs. 42%,P <0.001)。两组的功能结局在随访1个月和6个月时相似。结论:这是第一项评估出院后遗漏受伤率的研究,并证明累积遗漏受伤率> 15%。这些伤害中有些与临床有关。尽管通过使流程正规化可以显着提高TTS的性能(从27%降至42%),但这并未降低漏诊率。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号