...
首页> 外文期刊>Wound repair and regeneration: official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society >Basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates and improves second-degree burn wound healing.
【24h】

Basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates and improves second-degree burn wound healing.

机译:碱性成纤维细胞生长因子促进并改善烧伤创面的二级愈合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Second-degree burns are sometimes a concern for shortening patient suffering time as well as the therapeutic choice. Thus, adult second-degree burn patients (average 57.8 +/- 13.9 years old), mainly with deep dermal burns, were included. Patients receiving topical basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) or no bFGF were compared for clinical scar extent, passive scar hardness and elasticity using a Cutometer, direct scar hardness using a durometer, and moisture analysis of the stratum corneum at 1 year after complete wound healing. There was significantly faster wound healing with bFGF, as early as 2.2 +/- 0.9 days from the burn injury, compared with non-bFGF use (12.0 +/- 2.2 vs. 15.0 +/- 2.7 days, p<0.01). Clinical evaluation of Vancouver scale scores showed significant differences between bFGF-treated and non-bFGF-treated scars (p<0.01). Both maximal scar extension and the ratio of scar retraction to maximal scar extension, elasticity, by Cutometer were significantly greater in bFGF-treated scars than non-bFGF-treated scars (0.23 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.06 mm, 0.59 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.15 mm: scar extension, scar elasticity, bFGF vs. non-bFGF, p<0.01). The durometer reading was significantly lower in bFGF-treated scars than in non-bFGF-treated scars (16.2 +/- 3.8 vs. 29.3 +/- 5.1, p<0.01). Transepidermal water loss, water content, and corneal thickness were significantly less in bFGF-treated than in non-bFGF-treated scars (p<0.01).
机译:二级烧伤有时会缩短患者的痛苦时间以及治疗选择。因此,包括主要患有深层皮肤烧伤的成人二级烧伤患者(平均57.8 +/- 13.9岁)。比较接受局部碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)或不接受bFGF的患者的临床瘢痕程度,使用Cutometer的被动瘢痕硬度和弹性,使用硬度计的直接瘢痕硬度以及完全伤口愈合后1年的角质层水分分析。与不使用bFGF相比,使用bFGF最早可在烧伤后2.2 +/- 0.9天使伤口愈合更快(12.0 +/- 2.2天vs. 15.0 +/- 2.7天,p <0.01)。温哥华量表评分的临床评估显示,bFGF处理的疤痕与未bFGF处理的疤痕之间存在显着差异(p <0.01)。在bFGF治疗的瘢痕中,最大的疤痕扩展和疤痕收缩与最大疤痕扩展,弹性的比率在bFGF治疗的瘢痕中均显着大于未bFGF治疗的瘢痕(0.23 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.06 mm,0.59 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.15 mm:疤痕扩展,疤痕弹性,bFGF与非bFGF对比,p <0.01)。 bFGF处理的瘢痕的硬度读数明显低于未bFGF处理的瘢痕(16.2 +/- 3.8对29.3 +/- 5.1,p <0.01)。经bFGF处理的瘢痕的经表皮水分流失,水含量和角膜厚度显着低于未经bFGF处理的瘢痕(p <0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号