...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of gastroenterology : >Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas
【24h】

Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

机译:腹腔镜与开放性远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: To compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas. Methods: This retrospective study included 28 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for SPT of the pancreas between 1998 and 2012. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the laparoscopic surgery group and the open surgery group. The patients' demographic data, operative results, pathological reports, hospital courses, morbidity and mortality, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. Results: Fifteen patients with SPT of the pancreas underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), and 13 underwent open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except for a female predominance in the LDP group (100.0% vs 69.2%, P = 0.035). Mortality, morbidity (33.3% vs 38.5%, P = 1.000), pancreatic fistula rates (26.7% vs 30.8%, P = 0.728), and reoperation rates (0.0% vs 7.7%, P = 0.464) were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in the operating time (171 min vs 178 min, P = 0.755) between the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss (149 mL vs 580 mL, P = 0.002), transfusion requirement (6.7% vs 46.2%, P = 0.029), first flatus time (1.9 d vs 3.5 d, P = 0.000), diet start time (2.3 d vs 4.9 d, P = 0.000), and postoperative hospital stay (8.1 d vs 12.8 d, P = 0.029) were significantly less in the LDP group than in the ODP group. All patients had negative surgical margins at final pathology. There were no significant differences in number of lymph nodes harvested (4.6 vs 6.4, P = 0.549) between the two groups. The median follow-up was 33 (3-100) mo for the LDP group and 45 (17-127) mo for the ODP group. All patients were alive with one recurrence. Conclusion: LDP for SPT has short-term benefits compared with ODP. Long-term outcomes of LDP are similar to those of ODP.
机译:目的:比较腹腔镜与开放式远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺实性假乳头状瘤(SPT)的近期和长期疗效。方法:这项回顾性研究包括1998年至2012年间接受胰腺远端SPT切除术的28例患者。根据手术方式将患者分为两组:腹腔镜手术组和开放手术组。比较两组患者的人口统计学数据,手术结果,病理报告,医院病程,发病率和死亡率以及随访数据。结果:15例胰腺SPT患者接受了腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP),13例接受了开放性远端胰腺切除术(ODP)。两组之间的基线特征相似,除了LDP组中女性占多数(100.0%比69.2%,P = 0.035)。两组的死亡率,发病率(33.3%vs 38.5%,P = 1.000),胰瘘发生率(26.7%vs 30.8%,P = 0.728)和再次手术率(0.0%vs 7.7%,P = 0.464)相似。两组的手术时间(171分钟对178分钟,P = 0.755)无显着差异。术中失血(149 mL vs 580 mL,P = 0.002),输血量(6.7%vs 46.2%,P = 0.029),首次肠胃胀气时间(1.9 d vs 3.5 d,P = 0.000),饮食开始时间(2.3 LDP组的d vs. 4.9 d,P = 0.000)和术后住院时间(8.1 d vs 12.8 d,P = 0.029)显着低于ODP组。所有患者的最终病理结果均为阴性。两组之间收集的淋巴结数目没有显着差异(4.6对6.4,P = 0.549)。 LDP组的中位随访时间为33(3-100)mo,ODP组的中位随访时间为45(17-127)mo。所有患者均存活一次复发。结论:与ODP相比,用于SPT的LDP具有短期优势。 LDP的长期结果与ODP相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号