...
首页> 外文期刊>Women and birth: journal of the Australian College of Midwives >Have the 2010 national maternity reforms delivered choice, control and continuity to Australian women?
【24h】

Have the 2010 national maternity reforms delivered choice, control and continuity to Australian women?

机译:2010年全国生育改革是否为澳大利亚妇女提供了选择,控制和延续性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In 2009-2010 Maternity Coalition (MC) worked really hard representing Australian women while the Commonwealth established major reforms in maternity care funding. This guest editorial asks the question; why, three years later, do so few Australian women have access to Medicare-funded midwifery? In this editorial I first review the history of the 2009-2010 Commonwealth maternity reforms, before examining the barriers to women's access to care from eligible midwives in private practice. I discuss the nursing and medical cultural forces that inhibit private midwifery practice, obstructing women's choice, control and continuity in birth care. In Queensland leadership from consumers, midwives, the Chief Nurse's office and the Health Minister encourages public maternity units to grant visiting rights to eligible midwives. Finally, I discuss some political forces for and against maternity reform and call on midwives and consumers to take action now to influence the political process at the local, state and national levels.
机译:在2009-2010年,孕产妇联盟(MC)的工作非常努力,代表澳大利亚妇女,而英联邦对孕产妇保健资金进行了重大改革。这位客座社论提出了一个问题。为什么在三年后,很少有澳大利亚妇女能够获得由医疗保险资助的助产士?在这篇社论中,我首先回顾了2009-2010年英联邦生育改革的历史,然后研究了私人执业中合格的助产士为妇女提供医疗服务的障碍。我将讨论抑制私人助产实践的护理和医学文化力量,这些力量阻碍了妇女在生育护理方面的选择,控制和连续性。在昆士兰州,消费者,助产士,首席护士长办公室和卫生部长的领导下,鼓励公共产妇单位向合格的助产士授予探视权。最后,我讨论了支持和反对生育改革的一些政治力量,并呼吁助产士和消费者现在采取行动,以影响地方,州和国家各级的政治进程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号