...
首页> 外文期刊>Wireless communications & mobile computing >Cross-layer directional antenna MAC protocol for wireless ad hoc networks
【24h】

Cross-layer directional antenna MAC protocol for wireless ad hoc networks

机译:无线ad hoc网络的跨层定向天线MAC协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we propose a directional antenna medium access (DAMA) protocol and its enhanced version called enhanced DAMA (EDAMA), which takes advantage of the benefits offered by directional antennas. Both of these schemes have been inspired by the IEEE 802.11 MAC, with major enhancements including a new neighbor discovery scheme, an optimized circular directional transmission of RTS and CTS to prevent the hidden node problem, reduce collisions and decrease node deafness, and also a multi-buffer management scheme. A pair of communicating nodes using these schemes simultaneously transmits the circular directional RTS and CTS only to those sectors with neighbors, hence reducing overall communication delay and enhancing throughput. The main difference between DAMA and EDAMA lies in the way buffering is provided in the MAC layer. Unlike DAMA, which uses a single MAC buffer for all antenna beams as in IEEE 802.11, EDAMA employs separate buffers for each of the antenna sectors and introduces an integrated network and MAC cross-layer design. This helps in eliminating the 'self-induced blocking' problem prominent in existing directional MAC protocols. We have compared DAMA, EDAMA, IEEE 802.11, and two recently proposed directional MAC protocols, and results show that DAMA and EDAMA perform better than existing MAC protocols in the majority of the scenarios investigated, while EDAMA is observed to perform best. We also point out that the performance usually depends on the network topology and traffic pattern.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一种定向天线媒体访问(DAMA)协议及其增强版本,称为增强型DAMA(EDAMA),它利用了定向天线的优势。这两种方案均受到IEEE 802.11 MAC的启发,并进行了重大改进,包括新的邻居发现方案,RTS和CTS的优化循环定向传输,以防止隐藏节点问题,减少冲突并减少节点耳聋,并且还具有多种功能。 -缓冲区管理方案。使用这些方案的一对通信节点仅将循环方向的RTS和CTS仅发送到具有邻居的那些扇区,因此减少了总体通信延迟并提高了吞吐量。 DAMA和EDAMA之间的主要区别在于在MAC层中提供缓冲的方式。 DAMA与在IEEE 802.11中为所有天线波束使用单个MAC缓冲区的DAMA不同,EDAMA为每个天线扇区使用单独的缓冲区,并引入了集成的网络和MAC跨层设计。这有助于消除现有定向MAC协议中突出的“自感应阻塞”问题。我们比较了DAMA,EDAMA,IEEE 802.11和两个最近提出的定向MAC协议,结果表明,在大多数研究的场景中,DAMA和EDAMA的性能要优于现有的MAC协议,而观察到的EDAMA表现最佳。我们还指出,性能通常取决于网络拓扑和流量模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号