...
首页> 外文期刊>Wear: an International Journal on the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear >Effect of Counterface surface roughness and its evolution on the wear and friction of PEEK and PEEK-bonded carbon fibre composites on stainless steel
【24h】

Effect of Counterface surface roughness and its evolution on the wear and friction of PEEK and PEEK-bonded carbon fibre composites on stainless steel

机译:端面表面粗糙度及其演变对PEEK和PEEK键合碳纤维复合材料在不锈钢上的磨损和摩擦的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The time-dependent variations in the dry sliding wear rate and friction of PEEK (450G and l00P) andcarbon fibre-bonded PEEK (APC2) on stainless steel (316S16) have been investigated and theevolution of wear scratches measured with optical profilometry. A three-pin-on-disk tester was used,operating at 0.18 ms{sup}-1, with a pressure of 1.0 MPa on 5 mm diameter pin. Specific wear rateswere calculated from mass lost by the pins at 15 km intervals and friction force was monitored by astrain-gauged torque beam. Two series of 90-km tests were performed for each pin/disk combination.The stainless steel disks had either a fine-ground or polished surface. The roughness of the groundstainless steel surface was chosen to coincide with the optimum value for low wear rate of the PEEKpins. To maximise pin/disk contact area, the PEEK and APC2 pin surfaces were run-in on 1000-gritsilicon carbide paper and ultrasonically cleaned in acetone before the first wear test. There was nosignificant difference in steady-state wear between these pins and those tested with as-mouldedsurfaces. The disks were analysed at 15 km intervals with the UBM profilometer, providing 3Dsurface scans and 2D profiles for roughness parameters without damaging the wear track. All thesurface roughness parameters reported in this work were produced from the UBM non-contactingoptical profilometer. A marked difference in specific wear rate was observed between the two typesof PEEK. The 450G had the lowest wear of 6×l0{sup}-6 mm{sup}3 N{sup}-1m{sup}-1 on boththe polished and ground counterface, whereas the l00P had wear factors of 1×l0{sup}-4mm{sup}3N{sup}-1m{sup}-1 on ground and 2×l0{sup}-5mm{sup}3N{sup}-1m{sup}-1onpolished stainless steel. However, the friction forces measured between the 450G PEEK and thepolished disk were up to three times higher than those against the ground disk, (0.35±0.01),decreasing to similar values as the polished surface became scratched. The APC2 pins showed verylittle difference in wear rate between the ground and polished disks. However, a steady decreasefrom 1×10{sup}-6 to 1×10{sup}-7mm{sup}3N{sup}-1m{sup}-1 over a distance of 90 km wasmeasured as more fibres were ground into a graphite transfer film lubricant and the coefficient offriction dropped from 0.35 to 0.18. The specific wear rates and coefficients of friction of the APC2samples were lower than those for PEEK, however, the APC2 caused more scratch deformation ofthe polished steel counterface.
机译:研究了不锈钢(316S16)上PEEK(450G和100P)和碳纤维粘合PEEK(APC2)的干滑动磨损率和摩擦的时变变化,并通过光学轮廓仪测量了磨损划痕的演变。使用三针磁盘测试仪,在直径为5 mm的针上以1.0 MPa的压力在0.18 ms {sup} -1下运行。从销钉每隔15 km的质量损失中计算出特定磨损率,并通过应变计扭矩梁监测摩擦力。对每种销钉/磁盘组合进行了两个系列的90公里测试。不锈钢磁盘的表面经过精细研磨或抛光。选择不锈钢表面的粗糙度,使其与PEEKpins的低磨损率的最佳值一致。为了最大化销/盘的接触面积,在第一次磨损测试之前,将PEEK和APC2销的表面插入1000粒度的碳化硅纸中,并在丙酮中进行超声波清洗。这些销钉与经模压表面测试的销钉之间的稳态磨损没有显着差异。使用UBM轮廓仪以15 km的间隔对磁盘进行分析,从而提供3D表面扫描和2D轮廓粗糙度参数,而不会损坏磨损轨迹。这项工作中报告的所有表面粗糙度参数均来自UBM非接触式光学轮廓仪。在两种类型的PEEK之间观察到比磨损率的显着差异。 450G在抛光和地面对接面的最低磨损为6×l0 {sup} -6 mm {sup} 3 N {sup} -1m {sup} -1,而l00P的磨损系数为1×l0 {sup } -4mm {sup} 3N {sup} -1m {sup} -1在地面上和2×l0 {sup} -5mm {sup} 3N {sup} -1m {sup} -1抛光不锈钢。但是,在450G PEEK和抛光盘之间测得的摩擦力比对磨盘的摩擦力高出三倍(0.35±0.01),随着抛光表面被划伤,其摩擦力减小至相似值。 APC2插针在磨盘和抛光盘之间的磨损率差异很小。但是,在将更多的光纤磨成90mm的距离后,测得从1×10 {sup} -6到1×10 {sup} -7mm {sup} 3N {sup} -1m {sup} -1的稳定减小。石墨转移膜润滑剂和摩擦系数从0.35降至0.18。 APC2样品的比磨损率和摩擦系数低于PEEK,但是,APC2导致抛光钢对接面出现更大的划痕变形。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号