首页> 外文期刊>Weed Science: Journal of the Weed Science Society of America >Spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) interference in wide row and ultra narrow row cotton.
【24h】

Spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) interference in wide row and ultra narrow row cotton.

机译:在宽排和超窄排棉中刺激了anoda(Anoda cristata)干扰。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was conducted in 2000, 2001, and 2002 at Stoneville, Mississippi, USA, to determine the effects of spurred anoda interference on yield loss in cotton cultivars Delta Pine 5415 (Gossypium hirsutum) and Pima S-6 (G. barbadense) grown under wide (1.0 m; WR) and ultra narrow (0.25 m) row (UNR) spacing. The relationship between spurred anoda density and dry weight per plot was linear. At a spurred anoda density of 8 m-2, spurred anoda dry weight per plot was 507, 322 and 777 g m-2 in 2000, 2001, and 2002, respectively. However, spurred anoda did not interfere with seed cotton yield in 2001, which was probably due to the low branch development in that year. Yield losses exceeded 55% at a spurred anoda density of 8 m-2 compared with the controls in WR and UNR. The effect of spurred anoda density on the number of bolls was nearly identical in 2000 and 2002 regardless of the cotton cultivar and row spacing. Boll weight decreased in response to spurred anoda interference. Spurred anoda interference reduced cotton branch dry weight in WR but not in UNR. The yield decrease as a result of spurred anoda interference in WR was due to the reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites (predicated on a decrease in branch weight). However, in UNR, the yield decrease was due to plant mortality; the plant density of both cotton cultivars decreased by one plant for each additional spurred anoda, but the yield per plant for surviving plants remained constant. Neither WR nor UNR cotton had significant advantage in response to spurred anoda interference. The decreased boll weight observed in UNR, and the failure to increase the number of bolls m-2 to compensate for decreased boll weight in UNR compared with WR may limit its appeal to cotton producers..
机译:2000年,2001年和2002年在美国密西西比州的斯通维尔进行了田间试验,以确定刺激的阳极氧化干扰对棉花品种Delta Pine 5415(陆地棉)和Pima S-6(巴巴达斯棉)产量损失的影响。在宽(1.0 m; WR)和超窄(0.25 m)行(UNR)间距下生长。刺激的阳极浓度与每块地的干重之间的关系是线性的。在刺激的aoda密度为8 m-2的情况下,在2000、2001和2002年,每块田地的刺激的anoda干重分别为507、322和777 g m-2。但是,刺激的阿诺达(anoda)并未干扰2001年的籽棉产量,这可能是由于该年分支发展不佳所致。与WR和UNR的对照相比,在8 m-2刺激的阳极浓度下,产量损失超过55%。无论棉花品种和行距如何,刺激的阳极浓度对棉铃数的影响在2000年和2002年几乎相同。铃重减轻是由于刺激的阳极污染引起的。刺激的阳极处理减少了WR中棉花分支的干重,而UNR中却没有。由于WR中的阳极氧化干扰而导致产量下降,这是由于棉铃滞留或结实部位的减少(基于分支重量的减少)所致。但是,在近东地区,产量下降是由于植物死亡造成的;每增加一个刺激的阳极棉,两个棉花品种的植物密度都会降低一株,但是存活下来的植物的单株产量却保持不变。 WR和UNR棉花都没有对刺激的阳极污染产生明显的优势。在UNR中观察到的铃虫重量减少,以及与WR相比,无法增加铃虫m-2的数量来补偿UNR中铃虫重量的减少,可能会限制它对棉花生产者的吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号