首页> 外文期刊>Weed Research >Weed community response to contrasting integrated weed management systems for cool dryland annual crops.
【24h】

Weed community response to contrasting integrated weed management systems for cool dryland annual crops.

机译:杂草社区对凉爽的旱地一年生作物采用对比性综合杂草管理系统的反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contrasting approaches to integrated weed management (IWM) for prairie cropping systems were evaluated by measuring weed response to six IWM systems in a wheat-oilseed rape-barley-pea rotation at Saskatoon and Watrous, Saskatchewan, Canada. The six IWM systems (high herbicide/zero tillage; medium herbicide/zero tillage; low herbicide/zero tillage; low herbicide/low tillage; medium herbicide/medium tillage; no herbicide/high tillage) included various combinations of seeding rate and date, herbicide timing and rate, and tillage operations, in order to achieve similar weed management levels. Changes in weed communities were assessed over 4 years by monitoring species composition and abundance at various times during the growth season. Principal response curves indicated a gradual increase in Thlaspi arvense, Chenopodium album, Amaranthus retroflexus and Fallopia convolvulus in the no herbicide/high tillage system. Winter and early spring annuals and perennials increased in most systems, but particularly in the low herbicide/zero tillage and medium herbicide/zero tillage systems. Although five of the six IWM systems provided similar results, changes in weed communities would suggest that operations could be revised to improve the overall management of certain weed species and reduce seed return in the no herbicide/high tillage system and in systems with low herbicide inputs and zero tillage. This study confirms the potential of contrasting IWM systems under the challenging environmental conditions of the Canadian Prairies.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00821.x
机译:在加拿大萨斯卡通和瓦特鲁斯,在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省的小麦油菜-大麦-豌豆轮作中,通过测量对六个IWM系统的杂草响应,评估了草原种植系统的综合杂草管理(IWM)的不同方法。六个IWM系统(高除草剂/零耕作;中除草剂/零耕作;低除草剂/零耕作;低除草剂/低耕作;中除草剂/中耕;无除草剂/高耕作)包括播种率和日期的各种组合,除草剂的时间和用量,以及耕作操作,以达到类似的杂草管理水平。通过监测生长季节中各个时间的物种组成和丰度,在4年中评估了杂草群落的变化。主要反应曲线表明,在无毒情况下, Thlaspi arvense , Chenopodium album , Amaranthus retroflexus 和 Fallopia convolvulus 逐渐增加。除草剂/高耕体系。在大多数系统中,冬季和早春的年度和多年生植物均增加,但特别是在低除草剂/零耕作和中度除草剂/零耕作系统中。尽管六个IWM系统中的五个提供了相似的结果,但杂草群落的变化表明,可以对操作进行修改,以改善某些杂草物种的总体管理并减少无除草剂/高耕作系统和低除草剂投入量系统中的种子返还和零耕种。这项研究证实了在加拿大大草原具有挑战性的环境条件下对比IWM系统的潜力。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00821.x

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号