首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Weed responses to fallow management in Pacific Northwest dryland cropping systems
【2h】

Weed responses to fallow management in Pacific Northwest dryland cropping systems

机译:杂草对西北太平洋旱地种植系统休耕管理的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A two-year rotation of summer fallow (SF)/winter wheat (WW) is the most common cropping system in low precipitation areas of the U.S. Pacific Northwest (PNW). In SF, multiple tillage operations are used to manage weeds and maximize soil water storage and potential WW yield. Reduced tillage fallow (RTF) is an alternative to SF that leaves >30% of the previous crop’s residue on the surface. A four-year (2014–18) field study was conducted to evaluate the influence of SF and RTF on weed species density, cover and composition in dryland WW; determine if changes in these weed infestation attributes have any influence on crop density and yield; and evaluate economic costs of each type of fallow management. The experimental design was randomized complete block with four replications where each phase of SF/WW and RTF/WW rotations was present every year. Individual plots of WW were divided into a weedy sub-plot with no weed control, general area with chemical weed control, and weed-free sub-plot where weeds were manually removed. Infestations of annual grass and other weeds in weedy sub-plots increased throughout the study. Grass weed cover, consisting mainly of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.), and total weed cover were significantly lower in WW following RTF than following SF in all years except 2018. Densities of grass and total weeds were similar in both fallow managements indicating that weed plants were larger in WW following SF than following RTF due to earlier or faster emergence. Grass cover differences were not found in general areas likely because of a reduced seedbank. When weeds were present, mean yield of WW was higher following RTF than SF indicating that weeds were less competitive in RTF. Reduced tillage fallow could improve weed management in fallow/WW cropping systems of the PNW compared to SF/WW, particularly if the most problematic species are grasses.
机译:在美国西北太平洋地区(PNW)的低降水地区,夏季休耕(SF)/冬小麦(WW)两年轮换是最常见的耕作制度。在科幻小说中,使用多种耕作操作来管理杂草,并最大限度地提高土壤蓄水量和潜在的WW产量。减少耕作休耕(RTF)是SF的替代方法,可在表面上残留超过30%的先前农作物残留物。进行了为期四年(2014-18年)的田间研究,以评估SF和RTF对旱地WW杂草物种密度,覆盖度和组成的影响。确定这些杂草侵染属性的变化是否对作物密度和产量有任何影响;并评估每种休闲管理的经济成本。实验设计是随机重复的完整块,具有四个重复,其中每年出现SF / WW和RTF / WW轮换的每个阶段。 WW的各个样地分为无杂草控制的杂草子区域,有化学杂草控制的一般区域和手动除杂草的无杂草子区域。在整个研究过程中,杂草亚图样中一年生草和其他杂草的侵害增加。除2018年外,所有年份的RTF后WW的草杂草覆盖度(主要由霜霉病(Bromus tectorum L.)组成)和总杂草覆盖度均显着低于SF。除休耕管理外,这两种草的密度和总杂草密度相似,表明SF后WW中的杂草植物比RTF后更大,这是由于出现较早或更快。由于种子库减少,在一般地区没有发现草皮差异。当存在杂草时,RTF处理后WW的平均产量要高于SF,这表明杂草在RTF中的竞争力较弱。与SF / WW相比,减少耕种休耕地可以改善PNW休耕/ WW耕作系统中的杂草管理,尤其是在最有问题的物种是草的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号