首页> 外文期刊>Welding Research Council Bulletin >Report no.2: evaluation of design margins for ASME code section VIII, division 1 and 2 -- phase 2 studies
【24h】

Report no.2: evaluation of design margins for ASME code section VIII, division 1 and 2 -- phase 2 studies

机译:2号报告:评估ASME规范第VIII节第1和第2和第2部分研究的设计余量

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Phase 1 Report on Evaluation of Design Margins for ASME Code Section VIII, Division 1, May 1996, provided justification for decreasing the design margin on ultimate tensile strength from 4 to 3.5.{sup}11 That report endorsed the reduction inthe design margin based on the improvements in the Code rules over the last 40-50 years and recommended further review of certain other factors to assure consistency of the existing rules with the reduction in the design margin from 4 to 3.5 for Division1.The Phase 2 Report includes the Phase 1 follow-up studies, evaluation of the design margins in ASME Section VIII, Division 2, and a comparison of the Section VIII, Division 1 and Division 2 Code requirements with those in several European pressure vesselcodes and standards which use lower design margins than ASME Section VIII. These include the British Standard 5500,{sup}5 the German Pressure Vessel Code (AD-Merkblatt Code),{sup}6 the Netherlands Rules for Pressure Vessels (Stoomwezen Code){sup}7 and the CEN/TC54 Draft Standard for Unfired Pressure Vessels.8
机译:1996年5月,ASME规范第VIII节第1部分的设计余量评估第一阶段报告提供了将极限抗拉强度的设计余量从4降低到3.5的理由。{sup} 11该报告赞同将设计余量的降低基于关于过去40至50年中《准则》规则的改进,并建议进一步审查某些其他因素,以确保现有规则的一致性,同时将第1部门的设计裕度从4减少到3.5。第二阶段报告包括该阶段1项后续研究,评估ASME第VIII节第2部分的设计裕度,并将第VIII节,第1节和第2部分的规范要求与使用比ASME更低设计裕度的多个欧洲压力容器规范和标准的要求进行比较第八节其中包括英国标准5500,{sup} 5德国压力容器规范(AD-Merkblatt规范),{sup} 6荷兰压力容器规则(Stoomwezen规范){sup} 7和CEN / TC54未点火标准草案压力容器8

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号